Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Mark Lawrence Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: The Cost of Dynamism (was Re: Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 16:09:15 +0000 Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: <56e44258$0$1598$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <8737rvxs89.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <56e7483d$0$1608$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <56ef9787$0$1516$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <56f02196$0$1588$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <85h9fxene8.fsf@benfinney.id.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de zxgD17rwJzWVWzVBJ6DfBwGIIBZNr8x+KdDu0ab1Jyyw== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'context': 0.05; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; 'performs': 0.07; 'complaining': 0.09; 'here?': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:which': 0.09; '\xe2\x80\x94': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'python.': 0.11; "hasn't": 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'badly.': 0.16; 'received:194.126': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'slow,': 0.16; 'subject:?)': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'beginner': 0.18; 'language': 0.19; '>>>': 0.20; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'referring': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; 'performing': 0.23; "python's": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'specifically': 0.28; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.30; 'somebody': 0.30; 'everyone': 0.31; 'knows': 0.32; 'language.': 0.32; 'problem': 0.33; "d'aprano": 0.33; "he's": 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'knowledge': 0.35; 'should': 0.36; 'instead': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'say': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'times.': 0.38; 'someone': 0.38; 'offered': 0.38; 'resources': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'subject:The': 0.61; 'received:194': 0.61; 'show': 0.62; 'skip:n 10': 0.62; 'strange': 0.63; 'different': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'mar': 0.65; 'numerous': 0.66; 'teaching': 0.69; '\xe2\x80\x93': 0.72; 'claims.': 0.84; 'expresses': 0.84; 'gains': 0.84; 'idiomatic': 0.84; 'prefers': 0.84; 'pythonistas,': 0.84; 'faith': 0.91; 'convinced': 0.93; 'improvement': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 248.80.126.194.pool.dsl.daisyplc.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 In-Reply-To: <85h9fxene8.fsf@benfinney.id.au> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:105560 On 23/03/2016 06:09, Ben Finney wrote: > Steven D'Aprano writes: > >> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 06:47 pm, Ben Finney wrote: >> >>> Bart can show good faith by *learning* idiomatic Python, with the >>> humility of a beginner. And also by refraining from rhetoric about >>> how bad Python's performance is, until he gains experience to make >>> those claims. >> >> "Humility of a beginner"... what a strange phrase to use about >> somebody who has been programming for decades. > > What a strange reading of what I wrote. Clearly I'm referring to the > fact Bart is a beginner in Python. > > To show good faith in learning Python – if indeed that is what Bart > wants, which I'm not convinced of given how much he prefers to talk > about a different private programming language instead – then he should > be taking advantage of the teaching resources that have been offered > numerous times. > >> What exactly is the problem here? Is it that Bart hasn't earned the >> right to say what we all know, that Python is slow, because he's an >> outsider? > > The problem is that Bart simultaneously is a beginner at Python, and > expresses astonishment that everyone shrugs when Bart's > dreadfully-written code performs so badly. > > Good faith is contradicted by asserting knowledge of Python, complaining > about how some deliberately non-idiomatic Python code is performing > poorly, dismissing suggestions for improvement — specifically in the > context of someone who admittedly knows so little about Python. > +1 -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence