Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Chris Angelico Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: "x == None" vs "x is None" Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:29:57 +1100 Lines: 45 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1AzaGJOOFngtnI4pE8fegA43aH8bosfdB/MNOcAQhLbQ== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'compiler': 0.05; 'none)': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; '"if': 0.09; 'check.': 0.09; 'none"': 0.09; 'subject:None': 0.09; 'jan': 0.11; 'times,': 0.13; '"is': 0.16; '10:05': 0.16; '2016': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'partly': 0.16; 'personally,': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; '>>>': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'chris': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'actual': 0.28; "i'd": 0.31; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'false': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'subject:" ': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'received:209.85.213': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.38; 'several': 0.38; 'rather': 0.39; 'term': 0.60; 'more': 0.63; 'within': 0.64; 'places': 0.64; '(is': 0.84; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'not)': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91; 'spell': 0.91; 'why?': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=GokLw8k4KTrWUHiyGkaPsEb+eTNbJwdgCbTxGIZxehE=; b=S/tYfJW6VgvWLO5GrISLmDKDZ0/u7Xg1Se30NWL0A0+nvt6JSgCj4m0w1H9SMQ62Gz p6Cj7F6tDkfbOPHwhhwMNxMHpuOL78nebfdMfjIPUtrTfgeJv4ZqE4uZsRE6N8wK3Gkb KKRhRdGQIfuPyeDJU4dS2l32VXo6NejCSMuB42vWm75fGbx+Lv1x5F3c1pEKYkPFGCDt WYEUjl+X7uUDzK6ArvxNlzPI//9vPF1n31E6wq6Qvlr0YzJmp7SoegisXvRzcSO099/z h0mXv3sOKNhrUSPmvtt1vtKqskn+5M6pBisTqmZ9vU7S2umE4wMrDalVq6i0jMYoRjWT BbtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc:content-type; bh=GokLw8k4KTrWUHiyGkaPsEb+eTNbJwdgCbTxGIZxehE=; b=MILTIRq+ezpguthhxGROKli8I/TqiB18d+HXpF2MScBoJKxM25BDcs6rXVnVErgMdq 4IK1qY2kvcffvGpS5GQl5yDYH91T/DjJwF2u9RLGUY+S2+C5iSchzr7/SWWFieGqnX9N rgc7k5H5rN1iBFNM5BhAtAnsKBvWrqFKDF2s74OPyjxgxI11/tjwNADMTeAfJkqjzQPm a58Ik2Or4F8GfMxSG8jRiYLP9v2DHvnN/dEhV/FZwUspN7VVhmt0UbBXueyAEcMuHf6D 5uDMG1Hpp3YcnmE3wM8ouydDWq4tMp6F5NOHoRSRfuNgj5ejjx/iJ0bNib8am0fujgF5 TltA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQAFyZeV5Mm/4aKOlr9e3LAvczw33ivsiMRWyspQMwdSAb2hMYRZuEXx7ckftP7FIRwW0idOMm3r72wNw== X-Received: by 10.50.28.19 with SMTP id x19mr6422017igg.92.1453030197166; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 03:29:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:101847 On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:05 PM, Ulli Horlacher wrote: > Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Ulli Horlacher >> wrote: >> > I have seen at several places "x == None" and "x is None" within >> > if-statements. >> > What is the difference? >> > Which term should I prefer and why? >> >> tl;dr: Prefer "x is None" as a check. > > And for the negation? > "if not x is None" or "if x is not None" > > I have seen the last one several times, but i do not understand it, because: > >>>> x=0 >>>> x is not None > True >>>> not None > True >>>> x is True > False There's no actual difference: >>> dis.dis(lambda x: x is not None) 1 0 LOAD_FAST 0 (x) 3 LOAD_CONST 0 (None) 6 COMPARE_OP 9 (is not) 9 RETURN_VALUE >>> dis.dis(lambda x: not x is None) 1 0 LOAD_FAST 0 (x) 3 LOAD_CONST 0 (None) 6 COMPARE_OP 9 (is not) 9 RETURN_VALUE The compiler can tell that "not x is None" is exactly the same thing as "x is not None". Personally, I'd rather spell it "is not None", partly because it reads more like English that way, and partly because one operator is better than two; but you're welcome to spell it "not x is None" if that has other benefits (eg consistency). ChrisA