Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'string': 0.09; 'append': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:string': 0.09; 'wrote': 0.14; '(something': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'replacing': 0.19; 'seems': 0.21; 'memory': 0.22; 'issue,': 0.24; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'subject:lists': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'holding': 0.65; 'subject::': 0.85 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Dave Angel Subject: Re:generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:18:41 -0500 (EST) Organization: news.gmane.org References: X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dpc6744192108.direcpc.com X-Newsreader: PiaoHong Usenet NewsReaders 1.36 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1390493790 news.xs4all.nl 2967 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:34699 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:64621 Vincent Davis Wrote in message: > (something about your message seems to make it unquotable) 64gig is 4^18, so you can forget about holding a string of size 4^50 If memory size is your issue, why not make the function a generator, by replacing the append with a yield? -- DaveA