Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.013 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:module': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'ah,': 0.09; 'received:mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com': 0.09; 'skip:l 60': 0.09; 'def': 0.13; 'result,': 0.15; 'iterator': 0.16; 'subject:Mac': 0.16; 'tempted': 0.16; 'this:': 0.16; 'wed,': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cheers,': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'feb': 0.22; 'cache': 0.24; 'suggestion': 0.26; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'yield': 0.29; 'correct': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'received:209.85.215.46': 0.32; 'list': 0.32; 'there': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'none': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'using': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'somewhat': 0.38; 'some': 0.38; 'doing': 0.38; 'i.e.': 0.39; 'received:209.85.215': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'might': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'more': 0.61; 'custom': 0.61; 'worth': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61; 'your': 0.61; 'believe': 0.65; 'complexity.': 0.84; 'dealers': 0.84; 'subject:plus': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=LVd2FJPbRv4uOrb3t37yGE52O4jydfxAbYMar0/c1fQ=; b=CgLfyA+McbHgN7Y0tEuktA93jZoO5zQaEY4y9pAuyaQe49xF9QbzqIphHN4EC/W0DE /HVlKdQGPJpr/bK/bk4DgOiMxAXvXVXn++orSas2Z9ry3lMmuuem1YVlp/tYQyNJU8A4 fWEhIsL4o2KYqsea/FX24j5FDKh/i9DdS73iI= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Ian Kelly Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 22:03:44 -0700 Subject: Re: Wanted: Criticism of code for a Python module, plus a Mac tester To: Python Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 37 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1329368656 news.xs4all.nl 6935 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53141 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:20502 On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:11 PM, HoneyMonster wrote: > As to your first suggestion though, I am having some difficulty. Note > that the vulnerability rotates; i.e. CONDITIONS[4] is not the same as > CONDITIONS[0]. > Is there a better way of doing it than a simple list.append()? Ah, it's more complicated than I realized. I believe this generates the correct result, although adding None to the dealers list is somewhat unsatisfactory: DEALERS = ["Dealer North", "Dealer East", "Dealer South", "Dealer West", None] VULNERABILITIES = [ "Neither vulnerable", "North-South vulnerable", "East-West vulnerable", "Both vulnerable", ] CONDITIONS = [(d, v) for (d, v) in zip(DEALERS * 4, VULNERABILITIES * 5) if d] I might be tempted to write a custom iterator for it, something like this: def rotating(iterable): cache = collections.deque() for value in iterable: yield value cache.append(value) while True: cache.rotate(-1) for value in cache: yield value # Using the original 4-length DEALERS list CONDITIONS = list(itertools.islice(itertools.izip(itertools.cycle(DEALERS), rotating(VULNERABILITIES)), 16)) But I don't know that it's really worth the added complexity. Cheers, Ian