Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'executed': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; 'statement.': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; '"def"': 0.16; 'received:72.11': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125.166': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'issue.': 0.19; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.22; 'statement': 0.25; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'example': 0.30; 'none,': 0.30; 'yet': 0.32; 'that,': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'another': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'subject:from': 0.40; 'received:websitewelcome.com': 0.64; 'received:184': 0.67; 'received:69.93': 0.67; 'subject:value': 0.84; 'received:gateway02.websitewelcome.com': 0.93; 'subject:better': 0.93 Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:28:16 -0700 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Williscroft Subject: Re: Returning a value from exec or a better solution References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: mail.admailinc.com ([192.168.10.136]) [72.11.125.166]:1467 X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 12 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1314742280 news.xs4all.nl 2413 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54479 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:12454 Rob Williscroft wrote: > Arnaud Delobelle wrote: >> That's not an issue. The last statement that is executed will be the >> "def" statement. > > You don't know that, an implementation may for example set __bultins__ > to None, prior to returning, its not an unreasonable thing to do and > the docs don't say they can't. Yet another excellent reason to have unit tests! ~Ethan~