Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.053 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.90; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'am,': 0.12; 'board.': 0.15; 'subject:was': 0.15; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'justify': 0.16; "society's": 0.16; 'subject:usage': 0.16; 'this:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'upgraded': 0.18; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.21; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'feb': 0.22; 'subject:numbers': 0.23; 'code.': 0.26; 'load': 0.26; 'looks': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.29; 'tue,': 0.32; 'implement': 0.32; 'too': 0.33; 'someone': 0.34; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'moving': 0.35; "we're": 0.36; 'subject:]': 0.36; 'fair': 0.37; 'run': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'think': 0.38; 'should': 0.38; 'unless': 0.39; 'johnson': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'more': 0.61; 'your': 0.61; 'offers': 0.62; 'fact,': 0.63; 'exceed': 0.64; 'making': 0.64; 'share': 0.66; "doesn't,": 0.84; 'man.': 0.93; 'wait,': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=a2ECra1NYnDMtf1SziF75oPj1A/0v5B1nBWwHw+dhkY=; b=Yt3FQht7z9EUi9Cu+FnU+2cfBGYQMZdhfqWEHoR3l2//yt/MjQ2zpHQx6CTc8O/vdc SQJljvkjLzDx/nIO1k0GF7EXY7QL1xUNGgOi9H3e3+kzF7/EgqTvoDtrNCJoTjsKkUOZ 4wbhTiPLzqeTWr2V3xdu2SCnBcH7J9CxbL+YQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4F36E2F5.9000505@gmail.com> <4f37229b$0$29986$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <4f3757cc$0$29986$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <1c0e800d-1196-4fcd-9eaf-4fd1788f7f74@q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> <4f38c44d$0$11112$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:37:31 +1100 Subject: Re: OT: Entitlements [was Re: Python usage numbers] From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 27 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1329183454 news.xs4all.nl 6870 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54766 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:20386 On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Rick Johnson wrote: > # Py>=3.0 > py> sum(earner.get_income(2012) for earner in earners2012) / > len(earners2012) > average_income > > Once you exceed that amount you are robbing your fellow man. How can > you justify making more than your fair share UNLESS someone offers > their work load to YOU? You can't. You are living in excess. And for > those who think the average_income is too small, well then, it's time > to implement population control! My equation looks something like this: # Brain >= 0,1 brain> Your contribution to society / Society's contribution to you This value should be able to exceed 1.0 across the board. In fact, if it doesn't, then as a society we're moving backward. Rick, what's YOUR ratio? Oh wait, you mightn't be able to run that code. You may need to download an upgraded brain. ChrisA