Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.008 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.98; '*S*': 0.00; 'api.': 0.05; 'abstraction': 0.07; 'subject:language': 0.09; 'underlying': 0.09; 'am,': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'library': 0.15; 'bindings': 0.16; 'cpython,': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'hardware.': 0.16; 'rantingrick': 0.16; 'exists.': 0.19; 'received:74.125.82.174': 0.19; 'received:mail- wy0-f174.google.com': 0.19; '(which': 0.20; 'language': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'assume': 0.23; 'etc,': 0.23; 'code': 0.24; 'library.': 0.25; 'preferred': 0.25; "i'm": 0.27; 'language.': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'sun,': 0.30; 'proposed': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'quite': 0.34; 'probably': 0.35; 'skip:" 10': 0.36; 'enhanced': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'authors': 0.38; 'should': 0.39; 'received:74.125.82': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'maintaining': 0.40; 'received:74.125': 0.40; 'called': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'huge': 0.64; 'subject:!': 0.67; 'offer': 0.72; 'subject:The': 0.73; '10:21': 0.84; 'subject:come': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4IaKvGxThxssbtob63nQ/42CWY2qT5RkVTadOXIf5NI=; b=uhI60T02Sk8mLeh6IYThd6BqAWDJMCwAWQDYOrg2CIl88YVvtAw+M4TnDFL40+a38q LXed5MUsSSbrOBTHAoDn0i1zDEhKNzC+hQz2cexfVh/wDUDb5Veo33w7lYjrw4Ozz+s7 TD4ZH2jhMujX6EecBKiznHlt1aXtLWAdvXa7E= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1bf8cf87-b173-470a-a05e-a65616c988a0@d22g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 10:36:55 +1000 Subject: Re: The end to all language wars and the great unity API to come! From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 19 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1309653418 news.xs4all.nl 21808 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45420 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8697 On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:21 AM, rantingrick wrote: > No. Aspell should offer bindings for THE "Unity API" and the > respective "abstraction communities" are then responsible for > maintaining a plugin for their "abstraction" into THE Unity API. > Your proposed "Unity API" (which I assume has nothing to do with Natty Narwhal's preferred interface) already exists. It's the C language. It's an abstraction layer between CPython, Pike, etc, and the underlying hardware. The C standard library has a huge set of utility functions like strcmp, malloc, and so on; by writing your code in C, you simply enhance the C library. Language authors make use of this enhanced C library to write functions to be called from that language. And I don't *blame* the PIke community; since I'm a part of it, and I'm quite probably the only part of it to need/want Aspell, I just write the facilities I want. ChrisA