Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7c4cc084-7b55-48f9-a3ac-219f33b69d0b@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
References: <7c4cc084-7b55-48f9-a3ac-219f33b69d0b@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
From: Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:22:47 -0700
Subject: Re: Removing items from a list
To: Thomas Philips <tkpmep@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: python-list@python.org
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.5674.1328905402.27778.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 36
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:20182

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Thomas Philips <tkpmep@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the past, when deleting items from a list, I looped through the
> list in reverse to avoid accidentally deleting items I wanted to keep.
> I tried something different today, and, to my surprise, was able to
> delete items correctly, regardless of the direction in which I looped,
> in both Python 3.2.2. and 2..1 - =A0does the remove() function somehow
> allow the iteration to continue correctly even when items are removed
> from the midde of the list?

No.  Your test works because you never attempt to remove two adjacent
items, so the skipping of items doesn't end up mattering.  Try the
same thing, but print out the values as you iterate over them:


>>> x =3D list(range(10))
>>> x
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
>>> for i in x:
...   print(i)
...   if i % 2 =3D=3D 0:
...     x.remove(i)
...
0
2
4
6
8
>>> x
[1, 3, 5, 7, 9]


Had you attempted to remove any of the odd numbers as well, it would
have failed.

Cheers,
Ian