Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'example:': 0.03; 'function,': 0.07; 'python': 0.09; 'called.': 0.09; 'globals': 0.09; 'objects.': 0.09; 'looked': 0.10; 'def': 0.10; '(like': 0.15; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'redefinition': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'define': 0.20; 'script': 0.24; 'allows': 0.25; 'pass': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'skip:[ 10': 0.26; 'am,': 0.27; 'skip:# 10': 0.27; 'functions.': 0.27; 'steps:': 0.29; 'function': 0.30; 'stuff': 0.30; 'problem.': 0.32; 'suggestion': 0.32; 'print': 0.32; 'function.': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'list': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'list.': 0.35; 'add': 0.36; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'why': 0.37; '(for': 0.37; 'rather': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'step': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'little': 0.39; 'skip:" 10': 0.40; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'your': 0.60; 'descriptive': 0.84; 'grew': 0.91 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 07:52:15 -0600 From: Michael Torrie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.7) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/10.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: avoid the redefinition of a function References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 46 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1347459014 news.xs4all.nl 6842 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49163 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:28967 On 09/12/2012 06:56 AM, Jabba Laci wrote: > I have an installer script that contains lots of little functions. It > has an interactive menu and the corresponding function is called. Over > time it grew long and when I want to add a new function, I should give > a unique name to that function. However, Python allows the > redefinition of functions: > > #!/usr/bin/env python > > def step_1(): > print 1 > > def step_1(): > print 2 > > step_1() > > This will call the 2nd function. Now my functions are called step_ID > (like step_27(), step_28(), etc.). How to avoid the danger of > redefinition? Now, when I write a new function, I search for its name > to see if it's unique but there must be a better way. I don't understand the other poster's suggestion to your problem. I have looked at your script and think I understand how you are using them. Keep in mind that functions in python are just objects. So rather than define them as step_##() and then search the globals list for them, why not just define them as descriptive functions (for example, "install_java") and then put them into a list. For example: def install_java(): pass def install_tomcat(): pass steps = [install_java, install_tomcat, etc] # or steps.append(install_java) if steps already has stuff in it, etc # then: for step in steps: step()