Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Random832 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: What does =?utf-8?B?4oCcZ3JlcOKAnQ==?= stand for? Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 10:19:05 -0500 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <662g3blobme52hfoududj27err185v2npm@4ax.com> <56397a18$0$11094$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de ZmBzgwAnnWGNg300PiZMkg1Zp6puJuvs5eXjtGa0tpiQ== Cancel-Lock: sha1:xDVsGR0i89iBBt+khdPmlAO8JtI= Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'diff': 0.05; 'needed,': 0.05; 'redirected': 0.07; 'scripts': 0.09; 'patches': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'ed.': 0.16; 'places.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'scripts.': 0.16; 'sed': 0.16; 'bit': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'chris': 0.26; 'regular': 0.29; 'editors': 0.29; 'mention': 0.30; "i'd": 0.31; 'option': 0.31; 'received:comcast.net': 0.33; 'file': 0.34; 'could': 0.35; 'there': 0.36; '(and': 0.36; "wasn't": 0.36; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'things': 0.38; 'someone': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'making': 0.62; 'between': 0.65; 'subjectcharset:utf-8': 0.71; 'obvious': 0.76; 'grew': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-68-39-146-59.hsd1.in.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:98309 Chris Angelico writes: > As someone who grew up on MS-DOS, I'd like to mention that EDLIN's > value wasn't in the obvious places. There were two features it had > that most other editors didn't: firstly, it would read only as much of > the file as it needed, so you could edit a file larger than available > memory; and secondly, all commands came from stdin, which could be > redirected - making it a poor man's 'sed'. Using EDLIN for regular > file editing was never the normal thing. Of course, both of those things are also true of ed. And I found it a bit interesting that use in scripts was mentioned as a contrast between sed and ed, when the original way patches were distributed (and diff still has an option to generate these) was as ed scripts.