Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'none,': 0.07; 'receipts': 0.07; 'though:': 0.07; '%s"': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:string': 0.09; 'unittest': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'skip:@ 20': 0.16; 'subject:possible': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'import': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'pass': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'cool': 0.30; 'assert': 0.31; 'class': 0.32; 'subject:from': 0.34; 'skip:s 30': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'question,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'subject:get': 0.81; 'otten': 0.84; 'approach.': 0.91
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: python-list@python.org
From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Subject: Re: Is it possible to get string from function?
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:50:06 +0100
Organization: None
References: <lb86kj$993$1@ger.gmane.org> <1389869982.38511.YahooMailBasic@web163803.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5084b66c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
User-Agent: KNode/4.7.3
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.5588.1389883815.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 28
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1389883815 news.xs4all.nl 2854 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:51191
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:64084

Albert-Jan Roskam wrote:

> On Thu, 1/16/14, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:

>>  class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
>>      @unique_receipt("foo")
>>      def test_t1(self, RECEIPT):
>>          pass

>  Very cool approach. Question, though: what would be wrong
>  with the following approach:
> 
> 
> import unittest
> 
> class Test(unittest.TestCase):
> 
>     receipts = {}
> 
>     def unique_value(self, k, v):
>         assert Test.receipts.get(k) is None, "Duplicate: %s" % v
>         Test.receipts[k] = v
> 
>     def test_a(self):
>         self.unique_value("large_value", "foo")

Nothing.