Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.etla.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <rosuav@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.030
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'correct.': 0.07; 'subject:process': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'thread': 0.14; '"is': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'geek': 0.16; 'weird': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'earlier': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; '15,': 0.26; 'gets': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'points': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'asked': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'larry': 0.31; 'front': 0.32; 'thanks!': 0.32; 'moment': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'subject:data': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'either': 0.39; 'wife': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'day.': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'within': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'urgent': 0.67; 'to:none': 0.92; 'dream': 0.95; 'won': 0.96
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=ptjVmYXxmI6PCW9RtC36jyigJ7p47XIf4qQ3veq9L9Q=; b=FF/qDahAA2+Rc6zxt8zeB8rRKk9nXtpqoP26paBH39IZSr/ijoWr8W7lXPXhcuS3xc 4Bo5cOdnDKQ2LvPGz/xs6091zwbvNcMw3Prj5cB5YizrALTGzIDOAftiaEO8AEPMmaTg aDDAX7pTkL3Q+9gWgHESkGv6OV4DxUexmQcCRZIyLH/Z+djCMuueoow/EzUagbS8CYdy fN3g6LhIQJONmX/Mo8eneEIaM4+Fl7gZ+TAg7/tl6r/KelHzOAC1KE+iXOzp5aS61hlw Q/FUIUeI3Wgubzv0v/IPzfnL4C1aUasaMu6IkekKl+SSjqTGXIS9vFTyNZEUv2kpayfc z8Gg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.108.194 with SMTP id hm2mr2984894pbb.22.1389717462238; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:37:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CACwCsY7eS2Ls7YWDSJET-b-Xt+hZnpsiCiPPDam3QnxXUHdQ4w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACwCsY6KBDVkS5jCMh9GyvhHyVgqcAH3YAYnGpMQvfBwexaTcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmpGKzCbB4ZMZG=UAhh5hq8JowUOuerS1dk-rt3T6_qCyw@mail.gmail.com> <CACwCsY6W3x+8QzkJ8GR7qeck9s4xkwkhUbRt4k2iBAGcFuUb2g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmp82qrVz03sZFLXyju0oL-3=qJrcn34UJU6N4qo+wF6tw@mail.gmail.com> <CACwCsY74dTc9vJ=j06Fq9rqXe_wmSHpYQ-qaC284CcgjEnrQ9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmrv7aG09p8H_v6tyJRQHo37o=_2ZX0sL96L_ZaDsddJNw@mail.gmail.com> <CACwCsY62pqvKVrs11+yv5Ox9QBSv4McQDZ3-0aGnaUezfm2Ywg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmp3MW2a1SE-zqZY5ZJSeZ3wnt+NnjKTuWYY1Coi5dLt5g@mail.gmail.com> <CACwCsY7eS2Ls7YWDSJET-b-Xt+hZnpsiCiPPDam3QnxXUHdQ4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:37:42 +1100
Subject: Re: efficient way to process data
From: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Cc: "python-list@python.org" <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.5465.1389717471.18130.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 21
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1389717471 news.xs4all.nl 2881 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52611
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:63916

On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As far as I'm concerned, you won geek cred the moment you said
>> "electron microscope", and "semiconductor wafers as they are being
>> manufactured" is just gravy.
>
> Thanks! You made my day. I showed this to my wife and she asked "Is that good?"

Heh! Geek language can be a bit weird at times. Of course, it's not a
dream job if things like this get tantalizingly dangled in front of
you and then taken away as you're given something less fun and more
urgent to do...

>> Do you actually mean here that the two points need to be within 1
>> micron, or that data gets combined if it's nearby in *either*
>> coordinate?
>
> Either coordinate.

Okay, so the code I put together earlier in the thread is correct.

ChrisA