Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder2.hal-mli.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!cs.uu.nl!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.01; 'cpython': 0.05; 'interpreter': 0.05; 'imports': 0.07; '9:15': 0.16; 'modules?': 0.16; 'windows?': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'received:209.85.210.174': 0.21; 'received:mail- iy0-f174.google.com': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'windows': 0.26; 'module': 0.26; 'work.': 0.27; 'random': 0.28; 'version.': 0.29; 'problem': 0.29; 'pm,': 0.29; 'chris': 0.30; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.31; 'version': 0.32; 'certainly': 0.32; 'does': 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'steven': 0.34; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'list.': 0.35; 'external': 0.35; 'post': 0.36; 'went': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'subject:with': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'received:192': 0.38; 'stable': 0.38; 'received:192.168.1': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'more': 0.61; 'simple': 0.61 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g29rBfrwKMNm7B9pplsCLCNxuWwdM1bAOWOVUF/wdJE=; b=udGDef/dUP/Y+6JbiTN26YAP8DL9zc6jwiVa3tgSSEzBbviZzJfPXFi5CfQPwVrTRD vu/4t89RDf+H/As8/NsmoQsjBKDuWUmQd7DlVih1w8+RbRXc9vyGYJFoFfZg3BIBMEVr ZCIyTznx2OD5g+4IOwVnMsCw6Ud+M+NKfoviM= Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 10:32:25 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111220 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "comp.lang.python" Subject: Re: Script randomly exits for seemingly no reason with strange traceback References: <4f2c6cec$0$29989$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> In-Reply-To: <4f2c6cec$0$29989$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 17 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1328373163 news.xs4all.nl 6891 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42189 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:19859 On 2/3/2012 5:25 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > Which version of Python, which version of Windows? I keep that information in my signature for every post I make to this list. CPython 3.2.2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17640 > If you upgrade Python, does the problem go away? I use the most recent stable version. It would be hard to say if the problem went away since it's rare and random AFAICT. On 2/3/2012 9:15 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > Do you call on potentially-buggy external modules? It imports one module that does little more than define a few simple functions. There's certainly no (intentional) interpreter hackery at work. -- CPython 3.2.2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17640