Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.073 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.86; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.04; 'reply- to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'c++': 0.12; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.15; 'subject:copy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'language': 0.17; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; 'so.': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'here?': 0.23; 'object,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.25; 'pm,': 0.26; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'at.': 0.30; 'semantics': 0.30; 'thanks': 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'from:addr:googlemail.com': 0.34; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'another': 0.37; 'getting': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'difference': 0.40; 'believe': 0.65; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'reply- to:addr:googlegroups.com': 0.74; 'algebra': 0.84; 'different.': 0.84; 'subject:write': 0.84; 'trick.': 0.84; 'skip:2 50': 0.91 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:16:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=123.204.77.169; posting-account=5JdMBQoAAABHnS4mjpqEzxnmWtgiiVNw References: <4f101f45$0$29999$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <9nb5ubFu17U2@mid.individual.net> <9nblhhFr5bU1@mid.individual.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: copy on write From: 88888 Dihedral To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1328307414 news.xs4all.nl 6901 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33626 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:19846 =E5=9C=A8 2012=E5=B9=B41=E6=9C=8814=E6=97=A5=E6=98=9F=E6=9C=9F=E5=85=ADUTC+= 8=E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=886=E6=97=B648=E5=88=8629=E7=A7=92=EF=BC=8CEvan Driscoll= =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > On 01/13/2012 03:20 PM, Neil Cerutti wrote: > > They perform the same action, but their semantics are different. > > operator+ will always return a new object, thanks to its > > signature, and operator+=3D shall never do so. That's the main > > difference I was getting at. Well, in any associative operation with an identity implemented in a comput= er language personally I believe the operator overloading part in C++ is = another teasing trick. =20 Do we have to work out the algebra here?