Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!zen.net.uk!dedekind.zen.co.uk!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'be:': 0.09; 'func': 0.09; 'header:In-reply-to:1': 0.09; 'none:': 0.09; 'wrote:': 0.15; '"if"': 0.16; "'\\n')": 0.16; '-john': 0.16; '50)': 0.16; 'received:167.206.4': 0.16; 'received:cv.net': 0.16; 'received:hcvlny.cv.net': 0.16; 'received:srv.hcvlny.cv.net': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'pm,': 0.16; 'def': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'cc:addr:gmail.com': 0.30; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'received:192': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'cc:2**2': 0.38; 'perhaps': 0.39; 'should': 0.39; 'subject:with': 0.39; 'believe': 0.66 Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:18:29 -0400 From: John Posner Subject: Re: Using decorators with argument in Python In-reply-to: <4E0B7D6A.1080404@stoneleaf.us> To: Ethan Furman MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <4e0a0a8b$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <4E0B5F7C.7030802@codicesoftware.com> <4E0B7D6A.1080404@stoneleaf.us> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 Cc: python-list@python.org, Lie Ryan , poisonousrattle5@gmail.com X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 31 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1309535310 news.xs4all.nl 21801 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38649 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8635 On 2:59 PM, Ethan Furman wrote: > def __call__(self, func=None): > if func is None: > return self._call() > self.func = func > return self > def _call(self): > print("\n" + self.char * 50) > self.func() > print(self.char * 50 + '\n') > I believe the "if" block should be: if func is None: self._call() return Or perhaps the _call() method should be revised: def _call(self): print("\n" + self.char * 50) retval = self.func() print(self.char * 50 + '\n') return retval -John