Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!nerim.net!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: UNSURE 0.221 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.56; '*S*': 0.00; 'say,': 0.05; 'subject:How': 0.10; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'jan': 0.12; 'itself.': 0.14; 'belongs': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'recorded': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'settings,': 0.16; 'subject:port': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'sort': 0.25; 'source': 0.25; 'options': 0.25; 'switch': 0.26; 'least': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; '[1]': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'absolute': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'easier': 0.31; 'dropped': 0.31; 'end,': 0.31; 'yes.': 0.31; 'know.': 0.32; 'ago': 0.33; 'mac': 0.33; 'trouble': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'basic': 0.35; 'connection': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'tech': 0.36; 'doing': 0.36; 'useful': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'half': 0.37; 'system,': 0.38; 'needed': 0.38; 'whatever': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'expect': 0.39; '12,': 0.39; 'support,': 0.39; 'even': 0.60; 'hope': 0.61; 'ago.': 0.61; 'new': 0.61; 'establish': 0.61; 'numbers': 0.61; 'information': 0.63; 'kind': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'talking': 0.65; 'carrier': 0.68; 'smith': 0.68; 'results': 0.69; 'hour': 0.70; 'connection.': 0.74; 'obvious': 0.74; 'article': 0.77; 'yourself': 0.78; 'subject:get': 0.81; 'business,': 0.83; 'actually,': 0.84; 'dsl': 0.84; 'hour,': 0.84; 'quicker': 0.84; 'upwards': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=J4DjPohFyRm4kJLahRrbBWMGZQenLJOIOwe43+enFAg=; b=tJQaMtZGEGXKk22FpxNprg96ou0Zfr2Z23AO54MqL7Wajo08V+p6IGbRg0+sPK+5vx ff+xZbOj/wAQeskJF3A35I4XckxIvxgvRHMs4e7idUL9XIKVFtcVNU4Xu3I+vSGA/cPu J7j3hWBE5ECZZ1qpFw9UiVhrUnYTlWxRNiPdHLYpibzNjWx0oZ7SgMruVujA853NB9A7 egQqQqJfLBK+aPbHLeGUgLhNgybZKvLiZRZXDNMcnoCEDLBfmFchC4P7IsR+C88n5qBK Jj6WC5QUROtVOtMkGl1STOeEfjYHzfTBh2bHR7y33WQ9Qcwqo9zPjliSpi/kws8EGmLG O41w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.122.40 with SMTP id lp8mr20846415pab.82.1389478100689; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:08:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <6a5ceb3f-021d-4acc-b618-ce53530fa2dd@googlegroups.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 09:08:20 +1100 Subject: Re: How to get Mac address of ethernet port? From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 02:23:46 +0100 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 35 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1389489827 news.xs4all.nl 2834 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54435 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:63736 On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Roy Smith wrote: > In article , > Chris Angelico wrote: > >> We had a connection set up a few years >> ago where the ISP tech recorded the source MAC into the far end, and >> only that MAC would work - so when I stuck in a different router, I >> needed to switch it to the old MAC before it could establish a >> connection. Stupid? Yes. Unusual? I hope so > > Actually, I think it's pretty common. Sad. > I had exactly the same problem a few years ago. My DSL router fried > itself. I got a new one and it was easier to make it fake out the old > router's MAC than to get my carrier to update their head end > configuration[1]. > > [1] Roy's law of dealing with service providers. Anything you can do > yourself is easier than interfacing with tech support. Unless you expect that doing it yourself will take upwards of an hour, don't even bother talking to tech support, at least with the ISPs I know. There's only *ONE* time when I got results quicker than that (or, say, half an hour absolute minimum): with iiNet, I rang their support and got dropped into a classic IVR system, and one of the options was "Press whatever to get the basic setup information for your connection". A couple more prompts and I was given a prerecorded pile of numbers and settings, one of which was the exact one I was having trouble with. With any other kind of business, this sort of thing belongs on the web site, but for obvious reasons that's less useful for an ISP :) ChrisA