Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Michael Torrie Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: [OT'ish] Is there a list as good as this for Javascript Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:01:10 -0600 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <3n0esc-r3p.ln1@esprimo.zbmc.eu> <5038313.yTPFmuZgmt@PointedEars.de> <09151817-fc79-4077-89a0-66e0c6551f9f@googlegroups.com> <1686453.n4820qZuCL@PointedEars.de> <3039159.EZm1bvJSo6@PointedEars.de> <56F6CBB9.9030800@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de OdV6ZUh3sK/7YgQYbnPpdAIO4eTP6f6drsqpq756fgqQ== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.032 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'reminded': 0.09; 'read.': 0.13; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:Javascript': 0.16; 'witnessed': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'subject:] ': 0.19; 'am,': 0.23; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'subject:list': 0.26; 'said,': 0.27; 'posts': 0.30; 'everyone': 0.31; 'another': 0.32; 'michael': 0.33; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.34; 'list': 0.34; 'but': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'received:org': 0.37; 'received:192': 0.39; 'well.': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'our': 0.64; 'subject:there': 0.66; 'us,': 0.69; 'communicate.': 0.84; 'subject:good': 0.84; 'subject:this': 0.85 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 In-Reply-To: <56F6CBB9.9030800@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:105781 On 03/26/2016 11:49 AM, Michael Torrie wrote: > Well said, Ned, and a good reminder for me, and I suspect all of us, to > considering how we communicate. It's our nature to think problems lie ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Sigh. Consider. And proof read. > with everyone else but us (as witnessed by recent posts from another > list member in this own thread), and it's good to be reminded to look > inward as well.