Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!uio.no!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.039 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:code': 0.07; 'bytes)': 0.09; 'bug': 0.10; 'subject:dead': 0.16; 'url:patch': 0.16; 'patch': 0.24; 'url:bugs': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'url:python': 0.32; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.33; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'short': 0.39; 'content- disposition:inline': 0.60; 'ref': 0.84 Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 22:58:28 +0100 From: Bruno Dupuis To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: why does dead code costs time? References: <50bf85c0$0$29994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <20121205182413.GI10865@hud> <20121205205057.GA14400@hud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121205205057.GA14400@hud> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 7 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1354744703 news.xs4all.nl 6876 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37558 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:34331 I added a patch on the issue tracker. It solves the bug for short (<32700 bytes) functions ref : http://bugs.python.org/file28217/16619-1.patch -- Bruno Dupuis