Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'attempting': 0.04; 'cpython': 0.05; 'instance,': 0.05; 'pointer': 0.05; 'warnings': 0.05; 'initialize': 0.07; 'exceptions': 0.09; 'match.': 0.09; 'proximity': 0.09; 'tuple': 0.09; 'api': 0.09; 'am,': 0.12; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.15; '(aka': 0.16; 'nest': 0.16; 'subject:syntax': 0.16; 'subject:question': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'meant': 0.17; 'wed,': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; '\xa0so': 0.18; 'written': 0.19; 'jan': 0.19; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.21; "doesn't": 0.22; 'feb': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'url:dev': 0.23; 'received:74.125.82.174': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.25; 'code': 0.25; 'saying': 0.25; 'pm,': 0.26; 'function': 0.27; 'code,': 0.27; 'raise': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.29; 'booth': 0.30; 'kelly': 0.30; 'tuples': 0.30; 'chris': 0.30; 'least': 0.30; 'does': 0.32; 'tue,': 0.32; 'anything': 0.34; "we're": 0.34; 'nested': 0.34; 'null': 0.34; 'received:74.125.82': 0.34; 'url:python': 0.36; 'similar': 0.36; 'reference': 0.37; 'but': 0.37; 'received:74.125': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'skip:_ 10': 0.37; 'think': 0.38; 'correctly': 0.38; 'url:docs': 0.39; 'url:org': 0.39; 'why': 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'carry': 0.62; '31,': 0.64; 'absolutely': 0.98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=18utvSbtDHyJONoCleYQFSH0WbaNogtBXu5FOwfqEkQ=; b=kWIhTc/Mhjv29dCf46yxfjf6sav8SLcOsyM3USsXouoSIaSh1aYpf9ZZGzPc4ZJvFk WECxirj8sf0gCrtknnhw4yFsiyp3cS5yCCvOv/BwoeRD6JWYQpBn1UIloGELfID+G5+h 5/Wp/In+VuRuTbgBI7pOoMlxG3Gc1i+68vh7E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALwzidnpfV_2mQnv33KfZ_WCqTfwahcWfO1fr6A29dGXG0wJ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <mailman.5218.1327946109.27778.python-list@python.org> <Xns9FEBE05D32BCCduncanbooth@127.0.0.1> <CAPTjJmqMBpF8TG341Vnfk8eWT8VJq3EgF-_9dnYeKpnPXxGsgA@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidnpfV_2mQnv33KfZ_WCqTfwahcWfO1fr6A29dGXG0wJ0Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:12:44 -0700
Subject: Re: except clause syntax question
To: Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.5277.1328058796.27778.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 26
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1328058796 news.xs4all.nl 6915 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52925
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:19674

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Duncan Booth
>> <duncan.booth@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>> Abitrarily nested tuples of exceptions cannot contain loops so the code
>>> simply needs to walk through the tuples until it finds a match.
>>
>> Is this absolutely guaranteed? The C API for CPython provides:
>> (Py2) http://docs.python.org/c-api/tuple.html#PyTuple_SetItem
>> (Py3) http://docs.python.org/dev/c-api/tuple.html#PyTuple_SetItem
>>
>> which doesn't have massive warnings on it saying "USE THIS ONLY TO
>> INITIALIZE A TUPLE" (compare, for instance, _PyTuple_Resize which does
>> carry a similar warning). Is the assumption then that we're all
>> adults, and that mutating a tuple is like passing a null pointer to an
>> API function (aka "loaded gun in proximity to foot")?
>
> I don't know why the docs are written the way that they are, but if
> you check the code, you can see that PyTuple_SetItem will raise a
> SystemError if the reference count is anything other than 1. =A0So I
> think that it is only meant to be used with similar caution and
> restraint.

Incidentally, I *think* that any correctly written C code attempting
to nest a tuple inside itself would make the reference count of the
tuple be at least 2 at the time of the call, and so it would fail.