Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!novso.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'contributor': 0.07; 'dev': 0.07; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'pep': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'uses.': 0.09; 'whole.': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; 'missed': 0.12; 'language.': 0.14; 'devs': 0.16; 'mark,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'referencing': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'survive': 0.16; 'which,': 0.16; 'worst': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'fix': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'figures': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'aspect': 0.24; 'tracker': 0.26; 'gets': 0.27; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'gives': 0.31; 'enforce': 0.31; 'regular': 0.32; 'open': 0.33; 'community': 0.33; 'whom': 0.33; 'core': 0.34; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'created': 0.35; 'convert': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'dates': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'effort': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'easily': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'everybody': 0.60; 'hope': 0.61; 'today.': 0.61; 'simply': 0.61; 'you.': 0.62; 'times': 0.62; "you'll": 0.62; 'high': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'talking': 0.65; 'life': 0.66; 'smith': 0.68; 'us,': 0.73; '10th': 0.84; '2.8': 0.84; 'alone.': 0.84; 'celebrated': 0.84; 'ethan': 0.84; 'furman': 0.84; 'horse': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: the Gravity of Python 2 Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 18:18:20 +0000 References: <78d91$52cbf8e9$541826b9$29485@cache1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl> <4b702$52cc262e$541826b9$22985@cache80.multikabel.net> <4cbf$52cc2e82$541826b9$11761@cache70.multikabel.net> <686$52cd4640$541826b9$21896@cache1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl> <52CEC7E5.60908@stoneleaf.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-78-147-21-105.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: <52CEC7E5.60908@stoneleaf.us> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 38 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1389291532 news.xs4all.nl 2917 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58718 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:63622 On 09/01/2014 16:01, Ethan Furman wrote: > On 01/09/2014 12:42 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote: >> On 09/01/2014 01:27, Roy Smith wrote: >>> >>> Naive datetimes are what everybody uses. It's what utcnow() gives you. >>> So why make life difficult for everybody? Python 3 didn't win a convert >>> today. >> >> Yep, dates and times are easy. That's why there are 17 issues open on >> the bug tracker referencing tzinfo alone. Poor >> old 1100942 is high priority, was created 12/01/2005 and has missed >> 3.4. So if it gets into 3.5 it'll have already >> celebrated its 10th birthday. It doesn't say much for the amount of >> effort that we put into looking after issues. > > Mark, I hope you are addressing the community at large and not the > core-devs. There are only so many of us, with limited time available. > > -- > ~Ethan~ As I'm not a core dev to whom do you think I'm referring? I'm aware that the high horse I get on about this is so tall that you'll need an oxygen supply to survive should you want to sit on it, but to me this is easily the worst aspect of the Python community as a whole. If every regular contributor to this list was to fix even one bug a week the figures would look rather better. Still, you can no more enforce that than you can enforce the core devs working on Python 2.8 :) Talking of which, have we got a PEP for that yet, or are the whingers still simply in whinging mode? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence