Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'raises': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'from:addr:python': 0.09; 'integers': 0.09; 'x86': 0.09; 'exception': 0.12; 'wrote:': 0.15; '3.2.': 0.16; '[errno': 0.16; 'bieber': 0.16; 'declaimed': 0.16; 'eckhardt': 0.16; 'from:addr:mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'from:name:mrab': 0.16; 'ioerror': 0.16; 'message-id:@mrabarnett.plus.com': 0.16; 'received:84.92': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122': 0.16; 'received:84.92.122.60': 0.16; 'reply-to:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'subject:function': 0.16; "hasn't": 0.16; 'command': 0.19; 'seconds': 0.21; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'debian': 0.23; 'happen.': 0.23; "shouldn't": 0.23; 'invalid': 0.25; 'changed': 0.25; "i'm": 0.27; 'lee': 0.28; 'received:84': 0.28; 'thu,': 0.28; '+0200,': 0.30; 'looks': 0.30; 'it.': 0.33; 'actually': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'reply- to:addr:python.org': 0.35; 'running': 0.35; 'skip:" 10': 0.36; 'some': 0.37; 'using': 0.37; 'takes': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'showing': 0.38; 'should': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'your': 0.60; 'here': 0.66; 'direct': 0.66; 'header:Reply-To:1': 0.71; 'reply-to:no real name:2**0': 0.72; 'dennis': 0.77; 'subject:call': 0.91; 'killed': 0.93 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApEHALuuDE7Unw4S/2dsb2JhbABSmGaOcHeIer80hjEElyWLOQ Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:18:13 +0100 From: MRAB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: how to call a function for evry 10 secs References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: python-list@python.org List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 23 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1309454291 news.xs4all.nl 21845 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59998 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8609 On 30/06/2011 17:42, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:37:34 +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt > declaimed the following in > gmane.comp.python.general: > >> "time.sleep()" takes a floating point number, so an underflow like for >> fixed-size integers in C shouldn't happen. What puzzles me here is your use >> of "apparently", because here a negative value actually raises an "IOError: >> [Errno 22] Invalid argument" when I call "sleep(-1)". >> >> The system I'm on is a Debian GNU/Linux system running on some x86 hardware, >> for the record, and I'm using Python 2.6.6. >> > WinXP, Python 2.5. > > And that was a direct cut&paste from a command window; showing it > had slept for some 90 seconds before I killed it. > Looks like it hasn't changed even in WinXP, Python 3.2. Is IOError what you'd expect, anyway? What should it do in Python 3.2? Exception or max(seconds, 0)?