Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.067 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.87; '*S*': 0.01; 'broken': 0.04; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'imo,': 0.16; 'limit,': 0.16; 'readability': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:addr:gmail.com': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'cc:2**1': 0.23; 'case.': 0.24; 'script': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'character': 0.29; 'code': 0.31; 'lines': 0.31; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'charset :us-ascii': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.38; 'header:Message-Id:1': 0.63; 'become': 0.64; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'jul': 0.74; '2013,': 0.91; 'joel': 0.91 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: PEP8 79 char max From: Ed Leafe In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:18:59 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <51F6C5F5.5020201@Gmail.com> To: Joel Goldstick X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Cc: Python Mailing List X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 19 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1375129541 news.xs4all.nl 15893 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60132 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:51491 On Jul 29, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Joel Goldstick = wrote: >> Would following >> this recommendation improve script performance? >=20 > Not performance, but human readability IMO, this isn't always the case. There are many lines of code = that are broken up to meet the 79 character limit, and as a result = become much less readable.=20 -- Ed Leafe