Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'true,': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; '(of': 0.07; 'interpreter.': 0.07; 'back.': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'afterwards': 0.16; 'development?': 0.16; 'editor,': 0.16; 'leakage': 0.16; 'namespace?': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'think.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'looked': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'script': 0.25; 'tracker': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'van': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'related': 0.29; 'went': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'running': 0.33; 'something': 0.35; 'editor': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'idle': 0.36; 'opposed': 0.36; 'integration': 0.37; 'application': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'anything': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'most': 0.60; 'back': 0.62; 'within': 0.65; 'advantages': 0.68; 'respect': 0.70; 'received:12': 0.81 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Emile van Sebille Subject: Re: Editor for Python Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 16:19:03 -0800 References: <3bfd7f87@news.airtel.net> <6b9049ab-e168-4f92-9526-edcaf806d2cd@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.184.110.78 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 27 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1389226764 news.xs4all.nl 2872 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:43013 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:63544 On 1/8/2014 3:46 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 1/8/2014 3:56 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote: >> On 1/8/2014 12:47 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: >> >>> For a Python editor, as opposed to a general code editor, the Idle >>> editor works pretty well and has some advantages with respect to >>> integration with the interpreter. >> >> While true, ISTM in the past there have been 'leakage' related issues >> with idle -- are those no longer a concern? > > I have looked through most of the Idle issues on the tracker but do not > remember anything about 'leakage' (of memory?) Of names I think. As I recall it had something to do with both idle and the application running in the same namespace? So the leakage was from within idle affecting the running of the script under development? Admittedly, it was a while back. But I never went back to idle afterwards either... Emile