Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Michael Torrie Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: wxpython strange behaviour Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:47:23 -0700 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <56470d3e-0a06-4ba1-8da7-b6966985b7f4@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 2/vNiCPzKEe5/lX6NXcRjAAtzHPMWFCMIWkam2K8nMrQ== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.112 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.78; '*S*': 0.00; 'bugs.': 0.16; 'created.': 0.16; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'example': 0.26; 'always,': 0.29; 'post': 0.31; 'another': 0.32; 'run': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; 'traceback': 0.33; 'message- id:@gmail.com': 0.34; 'editor': 0.34; 'problem.': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'lines': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'test': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'provide': 0.61; 'further': 0.62; 'details': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'more': 0.63; 'complete': 0.63; 'you.': 0.64 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:101830 On 01/15/2016 05:58 PM, Shiva Upreti wrote: > > What kind of further details do you want? Please tell me and i will try my best to provide them. As always, post a small but complete example test program (no more than 20 lines of code) that has the problem. Paste it in such a way that one can copy and paste it into an editor and get a validly-formatted program. Also post the traceback you get when you run the test program you created. Another person has to be able to replicate the problem to advise you. Often in the process of doing this, people find their own bugs.