Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'func': 0.09; 'message- id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'keyword.': 0.16; 'received:72.11': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125': 0.16; 'received:72.11.125.166': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; 'def': 0.16; 'cc:2**0': 0.21; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'code': 0.24; 'keyword': 0.25; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; 'kelly': 0.30; 'thanks': 0.31; 'actually': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.34; 'function.': 0.35; 'probably': 0.35; 'limitation': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'subject:with': 0.39; "i'd": 0.40; 'received:websitewelcome.com': 0.65; 'received:184': 0.67; 'received:69.93': 0.67; 'loses': 0.84; 'received:gateway02.websitewelcome.com': 0.93 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:51:18 -0700 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Kelly Subject: Re: Using decorators with argument in Python References: <4e0a0a8b$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <4E0B5F7C.7030802@codicesoftware.com> <4E0B7D6A.1080404@stoneleaf.us> <4E0B9949.1040805@stoneleaf.us> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: mail.admailinc.com ([192.168.10.136]) [72.11.125.166]:1948 X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us X-Email-Count: 3 X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1309383412 news.xs4all.nl 21865 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58173 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8589 Ian Kelly wrote: > > @enclose > def test5(string, func): > print(func(string)) > test5('broken', func=str.upper) Yes, that is a limitation -- one loses the func keyword for the decorated function. If I were to actually use this, I'd probably go with '_func' as the keyword. ~Ethan~ PS Thanks for the code review!