Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'rename': 0.07; '[1,': 0.09; 'from:addr:ethan': 0.09; 'from:addr:stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'from:name:ethan furman': 0.09; 'message-id:@stoneleaf.us': 0.09; 'received:184.172': 0.09; 'received:gator410.hostgator.com': 0.09; 'subject:()': 0.09; '~ethan~': 0.09; 'iterated': 0.16; 'iteration': 0.16; 'set-like': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'decide': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'sets': 0.30; 'keys': 0.31; 'operations.': 0.31; 'common': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'charset:us- ascii': 0.36; 'clear': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:173': 0.61; 'subject: & ': 0.68; 'case?': 0.84; 'received:67.18.82': 0.84; 'received:gateway14.websitewelcome.com': 0.84; 'deal,': 0.93 Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:22:11 -0700 From: Ethan Furman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Python Subject: Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() References: <51EF2AD8.3080105@stoneleaf.us> <51F01D9E.2030903@stoneleaf.us> <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF474185C131B@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> In-Reply-To: <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF474185C131B@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator410.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - python.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stoneleaf.us X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: ([173.12.184.233]) [173.12.184.233]:46925 X-Source-Auth: ethan+stoneleaf.us X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: dG9idWs7dG9idWs7Z2F0b3I0MTAuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 32 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1374709915 news.xs4all.nl 15878 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37027 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:51175 On 07/24/2013 01:34 PM, Prasad, Ramit wrote: > > I am still not clear on the advantage of views vs. iterators. What > makes d.viewkeys() better than d.iterkeys()? Why did they decide > not to rename d.iterkeys() to d.keys() and instead use d.viewkeys()? > Is the iteration over a set operation on keys really that common a > use case? From a practical standpoint, iterkeys() is a one-shot deal, while viewkeys() can be iterated over multiple times: --> d = {1: 'one', 2: 'two', 3: 'three'} --> di = d.iterkeys() --> list(di) [1, 2, 3] --> list(di) [] --> dv = d.viewkeys() --> list(dv) [1, 2, 3] --> list(dv) [1, 2, 3] And views are not sets -- they just support a couple set-like operations. -- ~Ethan~