Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!amsnews11.chello.com!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.033 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'guido': 0.03; 'attempting': 0.04; 'imply': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'identifier,': 0.09; 'subject:language': 0.09; '25,': 0.12; 'am,': 0.12; 'message-----': 0.12; 'to:name:python-list@python.org': 0.15; 'wednesday,': 0.15; 'administer': 0.16; 'no;': 0.16; 'number?': 0.16; 'sticking': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; "wouldn't": 0.17; 'language': 0.17; 'wed,': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'jan': 0.19; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'dictionary': 0.23; 'modification': 0.23; "shouldn't": 0.23; 'chris': 0.30; 'correct': 0.31; 'version': 0.31; 'requests': 0.32; "isn't": 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'subject:': 0.34; 'right,': 0.34; 'someone': 0.34; 'anything': 0.34; 'largest': 0.34; 'especially': 0.35; 'sent:': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.36; 'difficult': 0.39; 'from:': 0.39; 'university': 0.39; 'why': 0.39; 'america': 0.39; "couldn't": 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'under': 0.40; 'huge': 0.60; 'fact,': 0.63; 'received:nz': 0.63; 'perfect': 0.64; 'here': 0.64; 'number.': 0.66; 'subject:!': 0.67; 'behaviors': 0.67; 'p.s.': 0.68; 'experts': 0.70; 'subject:The': 0.71; 'received:co.nz': 0.73; 'a.m.': 0.84; 'bookings': 0.84; 'email addr:yahoo.co.uk]': 0.84; 'proves': 0.84; 'received:219': 0.85; '"talking"': 0.91; 'subject:English': 0.91; 'surprise,': 0.91; 'subject:\t': 0.93 From: Phil Runciman To: "python-list@python.org" Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:32:32 +1300 Subject: RE: The devolution of English language and slothful c.l.p behaviours exposed! Thread-Topic: The devolution of English language and slothful c.l.p behaviours exposed! Thread-Index: Acza34rkOSw5MzGTSEecwobdBxb9xQAF0KDw References: <60ffdf06-f2e6-4cf7-ae7d-1c0afe2e9d40@f11g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <4F1ED269.20106@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US, en-NZ Content-Language: en-US acceptlanguage: en-US, en-NZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 49 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1327451569 news.xs4all.nl 6943 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55533 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:19375 "Talking" about version numbers, shouldn't the English dictionary and gramm= ar be under version control? I nominate Oxford University to administer thi= s, after all they produce the largest English dictionary and are experts on= English grammar. Someone had better let them know because the impending av= alanche of bookings out for modification may take them by surprise, especia= lly the number of requests from the North America and Australia.=20 Here in New Zealand, they gave up attempting to use correct English years a= go.=20 Phil Runciman=20 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Blockheads Oi Oi [mailto:breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, 25 January 2012 10:26 a.m. > To: python-list@python.org > Subject: Re: The devolution of English language and slothful c.l.p > behaviors exposed! >=20 > On 24/01/2012 21:20, Chris Angelico wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Blockheads Oi Oi > > wrote: > >> On 24/01/2012 20:03, Joshua Landau wrote: > >>> A simple version number doesn't imply huge breakages. Try "English2 > v1.0"! > >>> > >>> In fact, why would a perfect language need a version number? > >>> > >> It would be difficult to maintain Python without a version number. > > > > That just proves that Guido couldn't get it right, because he isn't > as > > perfect as Rick. No; Rick wouldn't need a version identifier, because > > he would get it right the first time. > > > > ChrisA > No; Rick wouldn't need a version number, because he never writes > anything that needs a version number. >=20 > Cheers. >=20 > Mark Lawrence. >=20 > p.s. please accept my apologies for not sticking my name on previous > replies. >=20