Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.002 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'guido': 0.03; 'imply': 0.07; 'python': 0.08; 'identifier,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'subject:language': 0.09; '25,': 0.12; 'am,': 0.12; 'no;': 0.16; 'number?': 0.16; 'sticking': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; "wouldn't": 0.17; 'language': 0.17; 'wed,': 0.17; '>>>': 0.18; 'jan': 0.19; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'chris': 0.30; 'version': 0.31; "isn't": 0.32; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.34; 'right,': 0.34; 'anything': 0.34; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'received:org': 0.37; 'difficult': 0.39; 'why': 0.39; "couldn't": 0.39; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'huge': 0.60; 'fact,': 0.63; 'perfect': 0.64; 'number.': 0.66; 'subject:!': 0.67; 'p.s.': 0.68; 'subject:The': 0.71; 'proves': 0.84; 'received:as13285.net': 0.84; 'received:2': 0.91; 'subject:English': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Blockheads Oi Oi Subject: Re: The devolution of English language and slothful c.l.p behaviors exposed! Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:26:11 +0000 References: <60ffdf06-f2e6-4cf7-ae7d-1c0afe2e9d40@f11g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <4F1ED269.20106@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-2-98-204-31.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120124-0, 24/01/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1327440397 news.xs4all.nl 6947 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42061 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:19373 On 24/01/2012 21:20, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Blockheads Oi Oi > wrote: >> On 24/01/2012 20:03, Joshua Landau wrote: >>> A simple version number doesn't imply huge breakages. Try "English2 v1.0"! >>> >>> In fact, why would a perfect language need a version number? >>> >> It would be difficult to maintain Python without a version number. > > That just proves that Guido couldn't get it right, because he isn't as > perfect as Rick. No; Rick wouldn't need a version identifier, because > he would get it right the first time. > > ChrisA No; Rick wouldn't need a version number, because he never writes anything that needs a version number. Cheers. Mark Lawrence. p.s. please accept my apologies for not sticking my name on previous replies.