Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'plenty': 0.07; 'preference': 0.07; 'responding': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; 'preferable': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'gui': 0.12; '*any*': 0.16; '10:17': 0.16; '24,': 0.16; 'all?': 0.16; 'task.': 0.16; 'usable': 0.16; 'wxpython': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'library': 0.18; 'wed,': 0.18; 'widget': 0.19; 'written': 0.21; 'email addr:gmail.com>': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'example.': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; '>': 0.26; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'url:mailman': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'url:python': 0.33; 'something': 0.35; 'editor': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'url:listinfo': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'wrong': 0.37; 'level': 0.37; 'issue': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'short': 0.38; 'structure': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'simply': 0.61; 'times': 0.62; 'personal': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'feeling': 0.68; 'pro': 0.69; 'jul': 0.74; 'difference.': 0.84; 'cognitive': 0.91; 'response,': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2GdsytPcenIpo8Zg4QL9wMS0N2Db2WbAyRVZorjmiSY=; b=MqfFbiSzYC5dK0dbeRABR/79QID8/GngE4Qss1l6TnV1nmbiuwM1SNKG+RE9vT56vT 3mb1b4vs+SrvF2hN4182surFXTleVgfUQSZJ0zWjpMcTpaLsK5TB1WYcJM8RsD8/tli7 bByDENLm7/f5h2SX+rd9UoX1z8C2m//UVH62gLtqA06/KKHnf+gve1imJaxuI+hVPSm5 qUK0I8RQMGoZii5zz6qEFSzdHXdJG5IEiceDzMgZiaKcSCQ+cAaH1jjFsdXJcBnJ5Tpn 3rL61AF4e1JbBqzZhFjfsjUY5BoJYEtDj3DMcvXualJl5SPcwjxbofcKOwDi8pt71neO jAqw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.128.72 with SMTP id j8mr7399804qas.41.1374675546152; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 07:19:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <571a6dfe-fd66-42cf-92fc-8b97cbe6e9e4@googlegroups.com> <51DFDE65.5040001@Gmail.com> <4f1067f6-bc99-42ad-9166-37fb228b90e8@googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:19:06 -0400 Subject: Re: RE Module Performance From: David Hutto To: Chris Angelico Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1efa69c298704e2429797 Cc: python-list X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 129 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1374675555 news.xs4all.nl 15926 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33657 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:51134 --001a11c1efa69c298704e2429797 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I've screwed up plenty of times in python, but can write code like a pro when I'm feeling better(on SSI and medicaid). An editor can be built simply, but it's preference that makes the difference. Some might have used tkinter, gtk. wxpython or other methods for the task. I think the main issue in responding is your library preference, or widget set preference. These can make you right with some in your response, or wrong with others that have a preferable gui library that coincides with one's personal cognitive structure that makes it more usable in relation to how you learned a preferable gui kit. On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:17 AM, David Hutto wrote: > I've screwed up plenty of times in python, but can write code like a pro > when I'm feeling better(on SSI and medicaid). An editor can be built > simply, but it's preference that makes the difference. Some might have used > tkinter, gtk. wxpython or other methods for the task. > > I think the main issue in responding is your library preference, or widget > set preference. These can make you right with some in your response, or > wrong with others that have a preferable gui library that coincides with > one's personal cognitive structure that makes t > > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:40 PM, wrote: >> > Short example. Writing an editor with something like the >> > FSR is simply impossible (properly). >> >> jmf, have you ever written an editor with *any* string representation? >> Are you speaking from any level of experience at all? >> >> ChrisA >> -- >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, > David Hutto > *CEO:* *http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com* > -- Best Regards, David Hutto *CEO:* *http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com* --001a11c1efa69c298704e2429797 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've screwed up plenty of times in python, but can wri= te code like a pro when I'm feeling better(on SSI and medicaid). An editor can be built= =20 simply, but it's preference that makes the difference. Some might have= =20 used tkinter, gtk. wxpython or other methods for the task.

I think the main issue in responding is your library preference, or=20 widget set preference. These can make you right with some in your=20 response, or wrong with others that have a preferable gui library that=20 coincides with one's personal cognitive structure that makes it more us= able in relation to how you learned a preferable gui kit.


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 = at 10:17 AM, David Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> wrote= :
I've screwed up plenty = of times in python, but can write code like a pro when I'm feeling bett= er(on SSI and medicaid). An editor can be built simply, but it's prefer= ence that makes the difference. Some might have used tkinter, gtk. wxpython= or other methods for the task.

I think the main issue in responding is your library preference, or wid= get set preference. These can make you right with some in your response, or= wrong with others that have a preferable gui library that coincides with o= ne's personal cognitive structure that makes t




On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Chris Angelico <ro= suav@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:40 PM, =A0&l= t;wxjmfauth@gmail.= com> wrote:
> Short example. Writing an editor with something like the
> FSR is simply impossible (properly).

jmf, have you ever written an editor with *any* string representation= ?
Are you speaking from any level of experience at all?

ChrisA
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list



--
Best Regards,
David Hutto
= CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com



--
Best Regards,
David Hutto
<= b>CEO: http://www.hitwebdevelopment.com
--001a11c1efa69c298704e2429797--