Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eweka.nl!lightspeed.eweka.nl!194.109.133.81.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.004 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'scripts': 0.03; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'difference,': 0.09; 'moreover,': 0.09; 'satisfy': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'from:addr:pobox.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:skip': 0.16; 'imported.': 0.16; 'followed': 0.16; 'sender:addr:gmail.com': 0.17; 'trying': 0.19; 'fit': 0.20; 'seems': 0.21; 'import': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; "haven't": 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'source': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'work.': 0.31; 'code': 0.31; 'actively': 0.33; 'not.': 0.33; 'could': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'easily': 0.37; 'issue': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'heard': 0.39; 'matter': 0.61; 'more': 0.64; 'side': 0.67; 'awhile.': 0.84; 'why?': 0.91 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lWRKKtXQu21frSzaV2D6TrtNyT/Pxdo4VlpA6DRQWT4=; b=FoJsBFF1mMyj4nm1wpOvMTBsuetO6iuY5HWF7p3YifwJu65F3MRI+XSLYzwPikFbMH rDjs4alf5p0ed6JHLq4P8Hr3k73ajE3pOAnDLpOHEZjtY4zoKJKALqAHK2w2M+cvle8I 70QJMHnaJKxdJWLP86ji2Nj3zTKLlPnobGLVsiNt7rdibxCMRpUNN1D7vKUtlz6wDdzX gYmsfhZFH6Ia9NW0jfLyiPVosS1ht0NxfnKZFI7/iqWT3ysdz7ZQDZpXgt+xlKkjNkT4 Q7zkA+hs+luAPHcww+xKvS8RZLCCjOojE2PBLkPkI+VPIoZU/HqNcwBp0A7dX9FSPkC6 Tl5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lWRKKtXQu21frSzaV2D6TrtNyT/Pxdo4VlpA6DRQWT4=; b=Knl7kYWOKqCfIwULb/DDtYMM+fLIN2Akw0W4cdJIuFte2ws8BPGcKgBZ4WuvTMF0Gh ZRu5hGKbdCez/v0eVCli+osaViZ7eh4aVA0sUfszEFF7WdzWhPMaK1dkJt+Fz79EhmdX ZH34a4STqs08fq3PHN6bjj72TvbTMchoNvDRhRqMpZIg3vKKtIJmG5WsJtGfb4rX62Go 4gZ3tg6BW2juCBxght0jxgopgTY7zAZNOPzsfY7IoGrsuDxXErbv7StiR/ztwXBAKABb jXW6KwpBnbDsa7xVDCKRhRSjG9kmUPMju2cGR6Da+D9jqS3325G2HRupdNJncWLBGgmy xO1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.101.36 with SMTP id fd4mr21280igb.13.1374606700223; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:11:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: skip.montanaro@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <402312e9-3952-48ff-99da-bd76856042e5@googlegroups.com> <9a7d2025-380a-43a9-add5-06691d77fc07@googlegroups.com> <2ff91ad7-a528-4a75-a4ea-5b6a9194a776@googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:11:39 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: lyHv3lvMbp0IFONeuVbQr-s_jj8 Subject: Re: Python testing tools From: Skip Montanaro To: cutems93 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 15 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1374606718 news.xs4all.nl 15965 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45958 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:51098 > Could you please elaborate on the difference of the two? I heard pylint > does not import your source code when it is analyzing, while pychecker does. > Does that make some difference? Moreover, do you personally like pylint or > pycheker and why? I haven't followed pychecker development for awhile. Pylint seems more actively maintained, though I could be wrong. The import issue is one significant difference, important if you are trying to check scripts which have side effects when imported. It's not a matter of like or not. I use what works and can easily be fit into the way I work. Both pylint and pychecker satisfy that constraint. S