Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Chris Angelico Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: The Cost of Dynamism (was Re: Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?) Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 13:03:07 +1100 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <87h9gcxkd3.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <56e4c077$0$1583$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de a2NaMZNKLfoUCCeurleZowCBiG+MK765V7uf+QoRhvbA== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.045 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:209.85.223': 0.03; 'puts': 0.07; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.09; 'subject:which': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; '(but': 0.15; '2016': 0.16; 'degree.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'python;': 0.16; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'received:209.85.223.173': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:?)': 0.16; 'worse.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'programmer': 0.18; 'thanks.': 0.18; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.20; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'code,': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; "doesn't": 0.26; 'points': 0.27; 'error': 0.27; 'least': 0.27; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; '13,': 0.29; 'you?': 0.30; 'strongly': 0.30; 'knows': 0.32; 'possibly': 0.32; 'common': 0.33; "he's": 0.33; 'that,': 0.34; 'gives': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'unicode': 0.35; 'knowledge': 0.35; 'quite': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; '(and': 0.36; 'faster': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'doing': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'enough': 0.39; 'where': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'still': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'him': 0.60; 'your': 0.60; 'subject:The': 0.61; 'more': 0.63; 'complete': 0.63; 'places': 0.64; 'mar': 0.65; 'debate': 0.66; 'him,': 0.67; 'intelligent': 0.76; 'obvious': 0.76; 'chrisa': 0.84; 'contemplate': 0.84; 'deserves': 0.84; 'idiot,': 0.84; 'respect.': 0.84; 'stunning': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.91; 'league': 0.91; 'successful.': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=+A9oZn9hsWyKYbnNIdauq40Y5GU6B2HTovM8ocogPXs=; b=R1GCNbjBmNnLrPue+O0Z0gSgKJ0KAKsOOhMN/TMaN3VXBNZ0FkpHd9CIvlEteZonon 5d/Bi2cradoFM4ZCVAuzluZC8JIDCuk96BjUPDj0RTJ8noYzVGkVWeaen8XbVMNZVh7v 0MS3dxKbC7SCv+U75hIAanvKz8OpcsftBySP3vHRcuyhu9p7T2+vtzqcwVXviaYHK/4o BdWZVfjt8bscm9ZQW8aqqYFU0Ff14kjrSzvO24ajVTWQEwC9QgTScMvlUvUatXlSJGa0 zsWEnXrkcFTxH7PuCOr+D8tIWaVF/Em07EYGWoZqG0+iqvqzdqrDMH0Z9QVNjX1lAVZg fLZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:cc; bh=+A9oZn9hsWyKYbnNIdauq40Y5GU6B2HTovM8ocogPXs=; b=MzDUOh/o8o7GZEUA6saPbZrH7R/bnfD5/Yp3JOJ3iOtsBPJU+5QWeYCfinVYnFhfZL M9kzxRoWZkLd1VG7KalErASrVJkOw4mWJTLkZT5XFQTN6b4UAmhiEI/R2ZRb0uIqv811 m/fFyF3pwXKPgyyle7W2UcWeNkixTxrMjZvL11hTyUvP8H0HfIpV8aCS5aFtAbrsdWSb PMcPAcEQpg59C0sQqW2eChYjuHEZhu46VHjpCiCAezgoWh0CP+pHcdrl9coIdV19gXT9 Pv7DQg/3O7nfbH1UasET3eXBEfk7KICFGf5x+hH0BPZDtEd/roAP1ZZd3UzNlwB8tgBR P0ew== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL8slMfNKqGl73wr+Gj2mEUE3pAhWA2H9cgcmELdse9cuT1In0bZFHbAPmiBz6pfHeKbJOcXvwwIUKIhA== X-Received: by 10.107.138.75 with SMTP id m72mr17601923iod.31.1457834587905; Sat, 12 Mar 2016 18:03:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:104738 On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > > Python works and is extremely successful. If it were made even faster it > would be even more successful. BartC would still be a complete idiot, as > the complete crap that he's been spewing over the last days puts him into > the same league as the RUE, possibly worse. It is so obvious that he knows > nothing about Python that I find it stunning that you can even contemplate > supporting him, or is he paying you? Be fair. BartC knows quite a lot about Python; his knowledge is imperfect, but whose isn't? I will debate strongly on some of the points where we disagree, and seek to educate on matters of Pythonic code, but he does know what he's doing to at least some degree. He is not trolling; perhaps he places more emphasis on performance than most of us do (and he definitely gives a lot more weight to microbenchmarks than I consider wise), and perhaps he doesn't give enough emphasis to Unicode support (but that's a VERY common programmer error - "I don't need that, it's fine"), but he is an intelligent programmer and deserves your respect. Thanks. ChrisA