Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!newsfeed.eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!81.171.88.15.MISMATCH!eweka.nl!feeder.eweka.nl!62.179.104.142.MISMATCH!amsnews11.chello.com!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:50:11 +0000
From: Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111224 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: while True or while 1
References: <4F1AC1D4.2080402@gmail.com> <mailman.4909.1327157944.27778.python-list@python.org> <pL-dnUjq2eH3t4bSnZ2dnUVZ5vudnZ2d@giganews.com> <CAFYqXL8PPOi2dy7M0ae+zCVB2yD6hPDdr7q8MhL0waadqoWvuw@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidm5NvdqCjrSTap2BE_mrgK9BjK7FEeGAM_cX=BDMKMrzQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F1DA186.1040807@wisc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4F1DA186.1040807@wisc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: python-list@python.org
Precedence: list
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.4983.1327351819.27778.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 39
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:19286

On 01/23/2012 06:05 PM, Evan Driscoll wrote:
>
> To play devil's advocate for a moment, if you have the choice between 
> two ways of writing something, A and B, where both are basically the 
> same in terms of difficulty to write, difficulty to maintain, and 
> difficulty to understand, but A is faster than B, even if just by a 
> hair, why NOT write A?
>
> It's like 'iter++' vs '++iter' in a C++ for loop. For ints, or for 
> some iterators with optimization, it makes no difference. But the 
> latter will be faster in debug builds, and *might* be faster in 
> release builds if you have a complicated iterator. So why NOT make 
> for(...; ...; ++i) the typical way of writing a for loop?
>
> In the Python world, is 'while 1' any harder to understand than 'while 
> True'? I'm about as staunch a supporter as you'll find for the idea 
> that 'while 1' should throw an exception, and even *I* think that 
> 'while 1' is about the least-offensive idiom out there. If 'while 1' 
> throws you off, I'd hate to see what you do when you learn that Python 
> accepts loops like 'while x' where the condition evaluates to true if 
> x is a non-zero integer and false if x is 0.
>
>
> All that said, I like the 'while "stuff to do"' idea.
>
> Evan

I think it's not the same, iter++ or ++iter is exactly the same in terms 
of readability, so of course
if one might be a bit faster, it should be used.

while 1 works because the 1 is converted to boolean automatically, but 
why not just writing a boolean
in the first place?

It's not bad of course but to me it's not very Pythonic, and reminds me C.
At that point I also prefer the "while 'might be long loop'" idea, which 
at least
adds some value *and* it might be very slightly faster too.