Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'scripts': 0.03; 'programmer': 0.03; 'subject:not': 0.03; 'syntax': 0.04; 'yet.': 0.04; 'odd': 0.07; 'subject:Error': 0.07; 'suddenly': 0.07; 'tries': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; 'collier': 0.09; 'ide': 0.09; 'lines.': 0.09; 'literal': 0.09; 'variables.': 0.09; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'itself.': 0.14; 'eclipse': 0.16; 'expression.': 0.16; 'fine.': 0.16; 'hint:': 0.16; 'indent': 0.16; 'newline,': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'semicolon': 0.16; 'troll': 0.16; 'unexpected': 0.16; 'way;': 0.16; ':-)': 0.16; 'sender:addr:gmail.com': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'code.': 0.18; 'obviously': 0.18; 'split': 0.19; 'not,': 0.20; 'starts': 0.20; '>>>': 0.22; 'programming': 0.22; 'aug': 0.22; 'coding': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'error': 0.23; 'replace': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'handling': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'related': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'easier': 0.31; 'lines': 0.31; '>>>>': 0.31; 'agreed.': 0.31; 'helpful.': 0.31; 'piece': 0.31; 'there.': 0.32; 'figure': 0.32; 'text': 0.33; 'bugs': 0.33; 'style': 0.33; 'third': 0.33; 'maybe': 0.34; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; "can't": 0.35; 'tool': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'johnson': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'everyone.': 0.36; 'next': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.36; "i'll": 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'similar': 0.36; 'error.': 0.37; 'wrong': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'auto': 0.38; 'others.': 0.38; 'tasks': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'previous': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; '12,': 0.39; 'called': 0.40; 'even': 0.60; 'skip:u 10': 0.60; 'read': 0.60; "you're": 0.61; 'further': 0.61; 'you.': 0.62; 'such': 0.63; 'refer': 0.63; 'become': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'here': 0.66; 'line,': 0.68; 'smith': 0.68; 'obvious': 0.74; 'article': 0.77; '95%': 0.84; 'obvious.': 0.84; 'understand,': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=+j4doVEExpOblNHLKCNQ1zoKGueGwqMghWaSNR/k9gM=; b=YNxyXpWBbvdYbaSt8+DgpL0OWs/tYjOeay8eAa93XiPn9Nr8SsIhSb8tgNndeDWgUl bw3s5N1Ofc2/iBHNosyEJYpYe+ah1Yr32D14ZNJLHT5/N+tDxpbyYMEVOdJdP/MyhS9N 4SFKW3bGsvl75B00W2ZGrAHrN8Ajy49EwmiJn4Q2zE7dwz0jnnnHP3VTN0UrsP+Y3ddU vL8FCqB7svhowjWNwkt3JRPjwNW4AMSsInGthFlei7WDFaQVI0cSIjXBKXXmYh+7WtH2 rqwSv4GvA9Bxfb5jGfViZ/3oizvJG21jDbvR4lRzm2GOI77jf4GjSCsCHP7iVRju5LCm UoEQ== X-Received: by 10.204.224.204 with SMTP id ip12mr3667468bkb.47.1376313635304; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 06:20:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: zachary.ware@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <5208D625.2000103@Gmail.com> References: <5206F4AB.8050204@Gmail.com> <5208D625.2000103@Gmail.com> From: Zachary Ware Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:20:15 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: oe_pXimfjXPIJGcIFNCVrCrJg58 Subject: Re: Am I not seeing the Error? To: Devyn Collier Johnson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Python Mailing List X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 52 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1376313643 news.xs4all.nl 15909 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55637 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:52414 On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Devyn Collier Johnson wrote: > > On 08/10/2013 10:47 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Roy Smith wrote: >>> >>> In article , >>> Chris Angelico wrote: >>> >>>> When you get a syntax error you can't understand, look at the previous >>>> line of code. Perhaps something there is incomplete; maybe you have >>>> mismatched parentheses, so this line is considered to be part of the >>>> same expression. >>>> >>>> Next thing to do is split it into more lines. Why is all that in a >>>> single >>>> line? >>> >>> Also, try reformatting the code in a tool like emacs or eclipse which >>> does syntax coloring and auto indenting. Often, if you're missing some >>> piece of punctuation, it will become obvious when your tool tries to >>> indent things in some unexpected way. Or suddenly starts coloring all >>> of your program text as if it were a string literal :-) >> >> Agreed. Though I've had some odd issues with SciTE in that way; I >> think its Python handling may have bugs in it here and there. But 95% >> of the time it's helpful. >> >> ChrisA > > > Thanks everyone. Unfortunately, I have not found the problem yet. I use the > Geany IDE which has syntax highlighting, but nothing wrong is seen. None of > the suggestions helped. The lines before this one set variables. The lines > further up "appear" fine. I will keep looking. If I ever figure it out, I > will share with all of you. > > As for the code being one line, my style of coding is very different from > others. I try to keep similar or related tasks on one line. Programming like > that is called trolling. A programmer that uses trolling is called a troll. > A troll can also refer to such a line of code itself. My scripts contain a > lot of trolls. It is easier for me to read trolls than "typical" coding > styles. Obviously not, since you can't find the syntax error. If you replace each semicolon in that line with a newline, the syntax error will be immediately obvious. I'll even give you a hint: it's on the third line. -- Zach