Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.007 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'python': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'useless': 0.09; 'properly': 0.15; 'fancy': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'unicode': 0.17; '3.2': 0.22; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.28; 'chris': 0.28; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.32; 'handle': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'version': 0.34; "can't": 0.34; 'received:org': 0.36; 'bad': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'wanting': 0.65; 'received:89': 0.86; 'subject:Good': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: Good use for itertools.dropwhile and itertools.takewhile Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:32:38 +0000 References: <05bca175-2077-4fb8-917e-baee1a43a47d@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-89-240-171-189.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 121205-0, 05/12/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 12 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1354721806 news.xs4all.nl 6867 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:57963 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:34286 On 05/12/2012 13:45, Chris Angelico wrote: > > I tested it on Python 3.2 (yeah, time I upgraded, I know). Bad move, fancy wanting to go to the completely useless version of Python that simply can't handle unicode properly :) -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence.