Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.042 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.92; '*S*': 0.00; 'interpreter': 0.05; 'subject:while': 0.07; 'def': 0.13; '"while': 0.16; 'boolean': 0.16; 'maybe': 0.21; "doesn't": 0.22; 'wrong?': 0.23; 'code': 0.25; 'tried': 0.27; 'looks': 0.27; 'pass': 0.28; 'true,': 0.28; 'anyone': 0.31; 'that,': 0.32; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'instead': 0.33; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.33; 'there': 0.33; 'received:209.85.212': 0.34; '(to': 0.36; 'but': 0.37; 'received:google.com': 0.37; 'using': 0.37; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'think': 0.38; 'received:192': 0.38; 'sometimes': 0.38; 'why': 0.39; 'received:192.168.1': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'difference': 0.40; 'more': 0.61; '13)': 0.93 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WT8nEvwVBj1SNILuvKCXjuMq/uJaFWXbcA6aRlJAjy8=; b=DSDAgOFzfnzvmRWsftFW9dgFhSvi6YaGKPc1MLrQpl3cVo6KZS3mBgcQnH83i8a4tM 33O/76CfEuOOPXjCSXdh+RYq+7sfkjRZH0dgkIveelZnybLFq2o7Z8KJTHy0kjLbk6+D Of2oQ77h3ws99rJEx7z7/rkWh9fQWDLYFqwEE= Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:47:00 +0000 From: Andrea Crotti User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111224 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: while True or while 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 36 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1327153625 news.xs4all.nl 6921 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:55121 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:19188 I see sometimes in other people code "while 1" instead of "while True". I think using True is more pythonic, but I wanted to check if there is any difference in practice. So I tried to do the following, and the result is surprising. For what I can see it looks like the interpreter can optimize away the 1 boolean conversion while it doesn't with the True, the opposite of what I supposed. Anyone can explain me why is that, or maybe is my conclusion wrong? def f1(): while 1: pass def f2(): while True: pass In [10]: dis.dis(f) 2 0 SETUP_LOOP 3 (to 6) 3 >> 3 JUMP_ABSOLUTE 3 >> 6 LOAD_CONST 0 (None) 9 RETURN_VALUE In [9]: dis.dis(f1) 2 0 SETUP_LOOP 10 (to 13) >> 3 LOAD_GLOBAL 0 (True) 6 POP_JUMP_IF_FALSE 12 3 9 JUMP_ABSOLUTE 3 >> 12 POP_BLOCK >> 13 LOAD_CONST 0 (None) 16 RETURN_VALUE