Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.073 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.86; '*S*': 0.01; 'mrab': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'encoded': 0.07; 'does,': 0.16; 'from:addr:torriem': 0.16; 'from:name:michael torrie': 0.16; 'subject:Could': 0.16; 'subject:Unicode': 0.16; 'tweak': 0.16; '(you': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'variable': 0.18; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'passes': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'first,': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'character': 0.29; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'sequence': 0.36; 'subject:List': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'system,': 0.38; 'message-id:@gmail.com': 0.38; 'whatever': 0.38; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'how': 0.40; 'term': 0.63; 'combining': 0.68; 'limit': 0.70; 'felt': 0.74; 'counts': 0.83; 'subject:this': 0.83; '160': 0.84; 'characters,': 0.84; 'experiment': 0.84; 'given.': 0.84; 'subject:you': 0.87 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at torriefamily.org Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 19:26:54 -0600 From: Michael Torrie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130105 Thunderbird/10.0.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: python-list@python.org Subject: Re: Could you verify this, Oh Great Unicode Experts of the Python-List? References: <5207AF15.7040604@mrabarnett.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <5207AF15.7040604@mrabarnett.plus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 10 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1376270824 news.xs4all.nl 15906 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54003 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:52396 On 08/11/2013 09:34 AM, MRAB wrote: > If twitter counts characters, not codepoints, you could then ask > whether it passes the codepoints through as given. If it does, then you > experiment to see how much data you could send encoded as a sequence of > combining codepoints. (You might want to check the Term of Use first, > though! :-)) I've always wondered if the 160 character limit or whatever it is is a hard limit in their system, or if it's just a variable they could tweak if they felt like it.