Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.114 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.77; '*S*': 0.00; 'responding': 0.07; 'subject: + ': 0.07; 'thats': 0.09; 'creates': 0.14; 'question.': 0.14; 'thread': 0.14; '[and': 0.16; 'better?': 0.16; 'separable': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'bit': 0.19; 'thu,': 0.19; 'saying': 0.22; 'instead.': 0.24; 'helpful': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'posts': 0.26; 'post': 0.26; 'asking': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'point': 0.28; 'correct': 0.29; 'chris': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'scale': 0.29; 'dec': 0.30; 'kevin': 0.30; 'subject:list': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; '"please': 0.31; 'responded': 0.31; 'talked': 0.31; 'this.': 0.32; 'maybe': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'done.': 0.35; 'good.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'google': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; "didn't": 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'too': 0.37; 'turn': 0.37; 'list': 0.37; 'list.': 0.37; 'being': 0.38; 'filter': 0.38; 'handle': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'volume': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'mailing': 0.39; 'free': 0.61; 'course': 0.61; 'simply': 0.61; 'telling': 0.64; '26,': 0.68; 'said:': 0.68; 'fact,': 0.69; 'mail.': 0.69; 'helping': 0.70; 'wish': 0.70; 'groups.': 0.74; 'other.': 0.75; 'subject:this': 0.83; 'batchelder': 0.84; 'clearer': 0.84; 'filtered': 0.84; 'inflammatory': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=z+IkuzHmdzArsiQqOffnKTj0xA1WCimfAPE8SWbrOkQ=; b=GCiyQr+aW+I1Pa1QRFjZhdccRsvmoWL9408gp/pkuMyODHU56GY9ZZfzz37oRWuOiY LHO8yqrIiTxrEOO6BAk/Qf9BSEWGEpSPDR1eYIHnN9N/BA0QEsbyw9ISnwaFc1IHCddp kyGdct2fP7TkzKyl+9+adeTlcpu40zgji0INQ9RKkDDBh7w9oteBewPlTyTEJvVL6r5j DoMvS50QU/LwCSZdFWWpKgVRxnaCOpqTfgzX6Jtyca9qH335yG0sWtzHukCHM/xavzVL TK0FuUo96wI2Mi85KCl3B8/JTSOcDEB+EVupDlrXU+59rTnkfu0IdZ1q0zBFTXpfb+T2 F26w== X-Received: by 10.66.156.106 with SMTP id wd10mr41713057pab.125.1388032475655; Wed, 25 Dec 2013 20:34:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <5a15bd65-8183-48be-8ac2-be0666fed75d@googlegroups.com> <049fb77d-e9ac-4cb3-9db9-d07f01340dbc@googlegroups.com> From: Rustom Mody Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 10:04:15 +0530 Subject: Re: Google Groups + this list To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 30 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1388032483 news.xs4all.nl 2938 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:52117 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:62724 On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote: >> Kevin started this thread by asking a question. Chris responded without >> helping the OP, and talked about Google Groups instead. That's not good. > > The only reason I didn't directly help the OP was because the code was > misformatted and it was necessary to request that it be reposted. > Perhaps I should have been clearer in saying "Please repost your code > with correct formatting", but there wasn't much else I could have > done. > > Or maybe I should have just filtered everything from Google Groups > into the bit bucket, because responding just creates threads like > this. Do you honestly think that would be better? No response at all > if the post comes from GG? I think Ned is being exceptionally helpful in keeping this list in order And you are being inflammatory in the above given that Ned just said: > I'm not telling people not to use Google Groups. In fact, I've said twice now in > this thread that we have to accept Google Groups postings as part of this list. > My point is simply that we have to take care not to turn this list into a list > about Google Groups, one way or the other. You are of course free to filter out GG posts if you wish -- thats a separable question. [And I reiterate my request to check why I have been kicked off from GG and have to use mail. As rurpy said I cant handle a mailing list volume of this scale for too long]