Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!newsfeed.freenet.ag!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'essentially': 0.04; 'url:launchpad': 0.05; 'python': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.10; 'c++.': 0.16; 'executable,': 0.16; 'interpreting': 0.16; 'language?': 0.16; 'lot!': 0.16; 'oqapy': 0.16; 'paqager': 0.16; 'qt,': 0.16; 'url:oqapy': 0.16; 'url:paqager': 0.16; 'url:qarte': 0.16; 'v.v.': 0.16; '\xe9crit': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'written': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.23; 'monday,': 0.23; "i've": 0.23; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.24; 'script': 0.24; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'converting': 0.27; 'received:209.85.212': 0.28; '20%': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'anybody': 0.32; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'thank': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'performance': 0.39; 'from:no real name:2**0': 0.60; 'save': 0.61; 'developed': 0.62; 'ever': 0.63; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'received:209.85.212.56': 0.91 Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:29:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.95.150.69; posting-account=IY-wHgoAAAATHphicf_TEp3JSi1cQSHl References: <1fdd6c92-2eb9-41b6-9cdb-84bfb3a4ed75@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-IP: 173.95.150.69 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: pyQT performance? From: jayden.shui@gmail.com To: comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: python-list@python.org X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Message-ID: Lines: 36 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1347302378 news.xs4all.nl 6975 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:32772 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:28843 On Monday, September 10, 2012 2:06:59 PM UTC-4, Vincent Vande Vyvre wrote: > Le 10/09/12 19:24, jayden.shui@gmail.com a =E9crit : >=20 > > Anybody has the experience of the performance of the program developed = by pyQT? Is it much slower than the one made by QT, such as (20%)? >=20 > > >=20 > For my experience, 20% is really surestimated. >=20 >=20 >=20 > I'm developping only with PyQt and essentially in the imaging domain >=20 > (viewing, transformation) >=20 > and I've never seen a difference of processing speed with the same >=20 > applications written in C++. >=20 >=20 >=20 > Qt + Python, a very good association. >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 >=20 > Vincent V.V. >=20 > Oqapy . Qarte >=20 > . PaQager Have you ever used py2exe? After converting the python codes to executable,= does it save the time of interpreting the script language? Thank a lot!