Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.mixmin.net!eweka.nl!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path: <vincent.vandevyvre@swing.be>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'essentially': 0.04; 'url:launchpad': 0.05; 'c++.': 0.16; 'from:addr:swing.be': 0.16; 'from:addr:vincent.vandevyvre': 0.16; 'from:name:vincent vande vyvre': 0.16; 'message-id:@swing.be': 0.16; 'oqapy': 0.16; 'paqager': 0.16; 'qt,': 0.16; 'received:mobistar.be': 0.16; 'url:oqapy': 0.16; 'url:paqager': 0.16; 'url:qarte': 0.16; 'v.v.': 0.16; '\xe9crit': 0.16; 'written': 0.20; "i've": 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; '20%': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'anybody': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'subject:?': 0.35; 'really': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'performance': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:192': 0.39; 'received:192.168': 0.40; 'developed': 0.62; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.63; 'received:80.12': 0.65
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:59:14 +0200
From: Vincent Vande Vyvre <vincent.vandevyvre@swing.be>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: python-list@python.org
Subject: Re: pyQT performance?
References: <1fdd6c92-2eb9-41b6-9cdb-84bfb3a4ed75@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1fdd6c92-2eb9-41b6-9cdb-84bfb3a4ed75@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Message-ID: <mailman.460.1347300418.27098.python-list@python.org>
Lines: 16
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace: 1347300418 news.xs4all.nl 6861 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:49764
X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:28840

Le 10/09/12 19:24, jayden.shui@gmail.com a écrit :
> Anybody has the experience of the performance of the program developed by pyQT? Is it much slower than the one made by QT, such as (20%)?
>
For my experience, 20% is really surestimated.

I'm developping only with PyQt and essentially in the imaging domain
(viewing, transformation)
and I've never seen a difference of processing speed with the same
applications written in C++.

Qt + Python, a very good association.

-- 
Vincent V.V.
Oqapy <https://launchpad.net/oqapy> . Qarte
<https://launchpad.net/qarte> . PaQager <https://launchpad.net/paqager>