Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: Grant Edwards Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: [OT] Compression of random binary data Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 19:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <5783e7a6$0$1608$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <2a412b20-925c-4778-a71d-fad6266feab8@googlegroups.com> <578508ad$0$1614$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <5785a790$0$1619$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <960e3589-00c9-4f71-97b1-2ffed104436f@googlegroups.com> <0502ae4a-e368-4552-4941-81c4584b57dc@gmail.com> X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de D6Q7bJaqiRaHWU7uWilz0wlzRxmetZI41suyw6D7R8sw== Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:: [': 0.03; 'chunks': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:qwest.net': 0.09; 'err,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:random': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'bytes': 0.18; 'numerical': 0.18; 'subject:] ': 0.19; 'algorithm': 0.20; 'am,': 0.23; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'wonder': 0.27; 'data,': 0.27; 'random': 0.29; 'that.': 0.30; 'certain': 0.31; 'michael': 0.33; 'structure': 0.34; 'should': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'thanks': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'no,': 0.38; "won't": 0.38; 'data': 0.39; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'email addr:gmail.com': 0.62; 'matter': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'authentic': 0.84; 'footprint': 0.84; 'ludwig': 0.84; 'edwards': 0.91 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Linux) X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-Mailman-Original-Message-ID: X-Mailman-Original-References: <5783e7a6$0$1608$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <2a412b20-925c-4778-a71d-fad6266feab8@googlegroups.com> <578508ad$0$1614$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <5785a790$0$1619$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <960e3589-00c9-4f71-97b1-2ffed104436f@googlegroups.com> <0502ae4a-e368-4552-4941-81c4584b57dc@gmail.com> Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:111408 On 2016-07-13, Michael Torrie wrote: > On 07/13/2016 03:46 AM, jonas.thornvall@gmail.com wrote: >> It is not that the data is not compressible i just need more chunks >> or random data, it is the footprint of the algorithm that has a >> certain it is a structure afterall albeit richer in interpretation >> than the numerical field. Well, thanks for that. Not only was it authentic frontier gibberish... > Err, no, that does not apply to "random." If the data is truly > random then it does not matter whether you have 5 bytes or 5 GB. > There is no pattern to discern, and having more chunks of random > data won't make it possible to compress. You might as well be arguing with Ludwig Plutonium. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I wonder if I should at put myself in ESCROW!! gmail.com