Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:15:12 +0000
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <mailman.46.1457453768.15725.python-list@python.org>
References: <mailman.238.1457265255.20602.python-list@python.org> <nbjmv7$ad5$1@dont-email.me> <87d1r6iltx.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <nbjp1e$jhv$1@dont-email.me> <nbjrjm$m16$1@gioia.aioe.org> <nbjvas$h22$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.17.1457364684.10335.python-list@python.org> <nbkhei$dg6$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.43.1457377845.10335.python-list@python.org> <nbknir$avu$1@dont-email.me> <56de28a1$0$1604$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <nblae9$nl0$1@dont-email.me> <56de57b5$0$1590$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <nbml2q$l4n$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de RRfbSq4CCw1l9udV60sgygLBieIxOc/ppltj2hoCMzng==
Return-Path: <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To: python-list@python.org
Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005
X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:which': 0.09; 'though...': 0.09; ':-)': 0.12; '2016': 0.16; 'corrupt': 0.16; 'py3': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'language': 0.19; 'lawrence': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.26; "doesn't": 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'language.': 0.32; 'changed': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; 'common': 0.33; "d'aprano": 0.33; 'steven': 0.33; 'world,': 0.35; 'faster': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.37; 'files': 0.38; "didn't": 0.39; 'easily': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'mark': 0.40; 'care': 0.60; 'real': 0.62; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.62; 'skip:n 10': 0.62; 'our': 0.64; 'march': 0.64; 'pythonistas,': 0.84
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.234.129.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
In-Reply-To: <nbml2q$l4n$1@dont-email.me>
X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post: <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help: <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:104338

On 08/03/2016 13:49, BartC wrote:
> On 08/03/2016 04:40, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> On Tuesday 08 March 2016 12:41, BartC wrote:
>>
>> Nevertheless, in the real world, you have to deal with corrupt JPGs and
>> files mislabelled as JPGs. And "crashing" doesn't count as "deal with"
>> :-)
>
> OK, I changed the 'raise' line to 'exit(0)'. Job done!
>
> (I couldn't recreate the problem easily because the common failures
> didn't call abortjpeg() at all.)
>
> It doesn't make Py3 any faster than Py2 though...
>

So what, if 99% of people couldn't care less about that fact?

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence