Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.014 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'false.': 0.09; 'bool': 0.16; 'boolean': 0.16; 'false:': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'normally': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'aug': 0.22; 'print': 0.22; 'adds': 0.24; 'interpret': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'am,': 0.29; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'equality': 0.31; 'another': 0.32; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'false': 0.36; 'i.e.': 0.36; 'possible': 0.36; 'level': 0.37; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'either': 0.39; 'simply': 0.61; 'here': 0.66; 'whereas': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=CSFyMGLe2+DpAAHLoNIRmEXhlWF+PxN7KE6GCb5XIcs=; b=YzztXGjSOxniZrxs7mAvt679qv14CYfz4P5GPMJwOqu7CN5LNtqdrpQwVlyXOV+doz E2WU5u+abkgitmJ0GP78poEO+FgqE0mAxyT+o/YnO8IAQRdnBeoJAHW7soK2QIq3KAw2 /acgohmjJhY6UHz+grNk/g5lXs4Y0tbsWUFZ+nWWl1q2aiL2+UML9GqYkBGedCHnk9SM IT7u2t4uBf7TGgrMtFjs5v+20gfFnS8CS61qbR/nfhwl9InrcH/PS8je4g3p/A1pnBgh do8/wdisH0a32IWRreC3+rbdSYeDOhg3OJKGX+Lap1kGpSgaWJbLOMPDuy6r9rAw9RD8 +DYA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.34.40 with SMTP id w8mr3077343vdi.7.1376191203721; Sat, 10 Aug 2013 20:20:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20130810114040.6ac78fe8@bigbox.christie.dr> Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2013 04:20:03 +0100 Subject: Re: Python Basic Doubt From: Chris Angelico To: python-list@python.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 43 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1376191211 news.xs4all.nl 15953 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42836 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:52349 On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Krishnan Shankar wrote: > i.e. Is this code possible > > if a is False: > print 'Yes' > if b is False: > print 'No' You would use that if you want to check if a/b is the exact bool value False. Normally you would simply spell it thus: if not a: print 'Yes' if not b: print 'No' which will accept any value and interpret it as either empty (false) or non-empty (true). Using the equality operator here adds another level of potential confusion: >>> 0 == False True >>> [] == False False >>> 0.0 == False True >>> () == False False whereas if you use the normal boolean conversion, those ARE all false: >>> bool(0) False >>> bool([]) False >>> bool(0.0) False >>> bool(()) False ChrisA