Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.016 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.05; 'reject': 0.05; '*not*': 0.07; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; '111111111': 0.16; '123456789': 0.16; 'equal.': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'statement.': 0.16; 'subject:random': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'language': 0.19; '>>>': 0.20; 'discussion': 0.20; 'arguments': 0.22; 'lawrence': 0.22; '2015': 0.23; 'demonstrate': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.26; 'sequence': 0.27; 'thread,': 0.29; "skip:' 10": 0.30; 'fri,': 0.31; 'language.': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'clear': 0.35; 'there': 0.36; 'statement': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; '12,': 0.37; 'received:org': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.39; 'team.': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'mark': 0.40; 'easy': 0.60; 'even': 0.61; "you've": 0.61; 'here.': 0.61; 'above,': 0.63; 'thomas': 0.63; 'our': 0.64; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'put,': 0.84; 'pythonistas,': 0.84; 'spite': 0.84; 'subject:Testing': 0.84; 'seriously,': 0.91; 'dream': 0.95 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: Testing random Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 08:53:58 +0100 References: <87oaksowwg.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <1451048.pW9z17ilMA@PointedEars.de> <3158703.Lr4HFMbMOd@PointedEars.de> <1656356.OjxBvjpJ5d@PointedEars.de> <5515034.V7dcXEWAvK@PointedEars.de> <1583276.2lplL8rY5W@PointedEars.de> <16299015.icEhCTIHP8@PointedEars.de> <1481051.eNy53rHVEB@PointedEars.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-78-147-17-71.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20+ Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 32 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1434182061 news.xs4all.nl 2875 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:37061 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:92586 On 12/06/2015 23:00, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn > wrote: >> Ian Kelly wrote: >> >>> The probability of 123456789 and 111111111 are equal. The probability >>> of a sequence containing all nine numbers and a sequence containing >>> only 1s are *not* equal. >> >> There is a contradiction in that statement. Can you find it? > > Yes. I phrased my statement as if I were addressing a rational > individual, in clear contradiction of the current evidence. Beautifully put, hence +1 QOTW. > > Seriously, if you reject even the statement I made above, in spite of > all the arguments that have been advanced in this thread, in spite of > the fact that this is very easy to demonstrate empirically, then I > don't think there's any fertile ground for discussion here. > Congratulations Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn, you've been promoted to my dream team. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence