Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.017 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'method.': 0.15; 'email name:patrick': 0.16; 'received:dip.t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'received:t-dialin.net': 0.16; 'testcases': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'from:addr:web.de': 0.23; 'tests.': 0.23; 'subject:please': 0.24; 'code': 0.25; 'module': 0.26; 'testing': 0.26; 'forgot': 0.29; 'idea': 0.32; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.33; 'instead': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'it.': 0.34; 'subject:project': 0.34; 'test': 0.35; 'portion': 0.38; 'received:org': 0.38; 'allows': 0.38; 'put': 0.38; 'went': 0.38; 'tool': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'dedicated': 0.61; 'your': 0.61; 'risk': 0.71; 'subject:your': 0.80; 'ugly,': 0.84; 'alone.': 0.93 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: your feedback to my first project please Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2012 14:12:28 +0100 Organization: None References: <499.26273427463$1325938350@news.gmane.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p50849e43.dip.t-dialin.net X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1325941958 news.xs4all.nl 6858 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:56042 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:18644 patrick@bierans.de wrote: > I know the TestCases are ugly, I still have no feeling for it. I forgot to mention: instead of testing each and every thing in one big method put each test into a short dedicated TestCase.test_... method. That reduces the risk of undetected side effects and often allows you to learn what went wrong from the -- thoroughly chosen ;) -- name of the test method alone. coverage.py is a good tool to give you an idea of what portion of your module code is covered by your tests.