Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!diablo1.news.osn.de!news.osn.de!diablo2.news.osn.de!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.005 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; '128': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'language.': 0.14; 'bytearrays,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'separator.': 0.16; 'zero,': 0.16; 'all.': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'looked': 0.18; 'split': 0.19; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.30; 'subject:skip:i 10': 0.31; 'up.': 0.33; 'sense': 0.34; "i'd": 0.34; 'but': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'half': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'expect': 0.39; 'explain': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'read': 0.60; 'simple': 0.61; 'our': 0.64; 'effectively': 0.66; 'cut': 0.74; 'batchelder': 0.84; 'promptly': 0.84 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: bytearray inconsistencies? Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:29:14 +0000 References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-78-147-30-118.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 21 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1387628971 news.xs4all.nl 2849 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:33864 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:62489 On 21/12/2013 01:58, Ned Batchelder wrote: > > If you have a zero, you can split on it with: > bytestring.split(bytes([0])), but that doesn't explain why find can take > a simple zero, and split has to take a bytestring with a zero in it. > Create a bytearray(range(256)) and partition it on 128. I'd expect to see the original effectively cut in half with 128 as the separator. You actually get the original with two empty bytearrays, which makes no sense to me at all. I also looked in test_bytes.py, read as far as "XXX This is a mess" and promptly gave up. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence