Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'dynamically': 0.07; 'statically': 0.07; 'indicates': 0.09; 'latter': 0.09; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'typed': 0.09; 'bug': 0.12; 'language.': 0.14; 'ah,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'roy': 0.16; 'thought.': 0.16; 'vastly': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'unlike': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'code,': 0.22; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.23; 'compilation': 0.24; 'subject:like': 0.24; 'compiled': 0.26; 'header:X-Complaints- To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'dec': 0.30; 'code': 0.31; "d'aprano": 0.31; 'steven': 0.31; 'languages': 0.32; 'knows': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'c++': 0.36; 'ones,': 0.36; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'catch': 0.60; 'everybody': 0.60; 'free': 0.61; 'our': 0.64; 'school': 0.64; 'here': 0.66; 'believe': 0.68; 'smith': 0.68; 'superior': 0.69; '"it': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Mark Lawrence Subject: Re: Why Python is like C++ Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:12:47 +0000 References: <52b57d97$0$6599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host-78-147-30-118.as13285.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: <52b57d97$0$6599$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 24 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1387628107 news.xs4all.nl 2919 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:59380 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:62488 On 21/12/2013 11:37, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Sat, 21 Dec 2013 05:34:51 +0000, Mark Lawrence wrote: > >> On 20/12/2013 14:19, Roy Smith wrote: >>> http://xkcd.com/1306/ >>> >>> >> I believe that to be a very superficial like. They're unlike in that >> once C++ people have compiled their code they can head down to the pub, > > Ah, the good ol' "It compiles, quick, ship it!" school of thought. > Absolutely, everybody knows that successful compilation indicates bug free code, which is why statically typed languages are so vastly superior to dynamically typed ones, hence why the latter will never catch on. Or do people around here know something I don't? :) -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence