Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!rt.uk.eu.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.06; '21,': 0.07; 'compiler': 0.07; 'subject:Why': 0.09; 'suffix': 0.09; 'type,': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'language.': 0.14; 'basic.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'integer,': 0.16; 'stuff,': 0.16; 'sat,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'normally': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'string,': 0.24; 'subject:like': 0.24; '(or': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'michael': 0.29; 'dec': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'that.': 0.31; 'though.': 0.31; 'maybe': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'basic': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.38; "you're": 0.61; 'day.': 0.63; 'float,': 0.84; 'modern,': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=5Z5N83LZzvupNXRNiYLWxoWOnN+2kVbGMjtEIxv/IGw=; b=fh0yVlf+d25UcXK4KGeqDy73MpnyljV/rhSB+CgQYjVZWnWVHWqkACa5DMAHjR8I2V 86qBD8GLbaoJ7hHoIHCXcLwijfYeCek94ud1rTLcX7B37CCRH7ytv9izooagL1TOk8J7 wnLqdGEALhLY5Q/lVL3NrLlRenFHBQflAkQLCPqtWnoRvn+4Ww8jHIssNytngVQ0RJ4R SyU/uuV1K5vTjUYMg8gYAnR60MvYSpLwyQB1rkD7g7FA2C+/7UTmw+/YcJf8Vrsy4LcH ZQIbou9kXe9EuPCV8cL1LRkWpejBPLuEJz8RRTfdlI67osrOems/4jI5gF2xSPChXi+p U2SQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.245.4 with SMTP id xk4mr13508370pbc.153.1387613846248; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 00:17:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:17:26 +1100 Subject: Re: Why Python is like C++ From: Chris Angelico Cc: "python-list@python.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1387613855 news.xs4all.nl 2962 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:42964 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:62476 On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Michael Torrie wrote: >> >> Maybe BASIC's of the 70s. But Not QB. QuickBasic was a pretty >> impressive compiler in its day. Completely modern, structured language. > > > I may have been thinking of GW-BASIC. There was > definitely something that was pretty much an > old-school BASIC with line numbers, GOSUBS and > all that. GW-BASIC is what you're describing. Q-BASIC isn't the same as QuickBasic, though. Q-BASIC had subs and functions and stuff, but it was still, at its heart, BASIC. And you could DIM something with a type, but normally it was the adorning suffix that determined type: A$ is a string, A% is an integer, A! (or A) is float, A# is double. ChrisA