Path: csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.003 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'newbie': 0.05; '"""': 0.07; 'subject:PEP': 0.07; 'pep': 0.09; 'subject:question': 0.10; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'python': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; "'a',": 0.16; "'b',": 0.16; "'c',": 0.16; "'d',": 0.16; "'e',": 0.16; '...,': 0.16; 'and)': 0.16; 'constructs': 0.16; 'enough.': 0.16; 'item:': 0.16; 'there...': 0.16; 'wording': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'trying': 0.19; '(but': 0.19; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'mon,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'second': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; "doesn't": 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'indentation': 0.31; 'file': 0.32; 'could': 0.34; 'agree': 0.35; 'skip:s 30': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'consistent': 0.36; 'in:': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'massive': 0.38; 'issue': 0.38; 'list,': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'wonderful': 0.60; 'skip:* 10': 0.61; 'july': 0.63; 'places': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'jul': 0.74; 'grow': 0.77; '|the': 0.84; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YyDgxj8DzAwd908ZKvThANy7fDpI13F/lHluMF6YZIs=; b=qeb5OIMf5smAGJthImJlmeiuvooKuGC3y4rv9n/M/EeZ1IQxSN+/NAxoSIIcALImRn 0LlB6EnJwABF5NaGnqQdZlTNtQyS1eJoholEnUWwexyXdzsdKzqdODSs482FyPwkFzNG 2Ue8LHuCO0Ym9cHt4z8AxTOnnwx7AQJew8ASRQN2UZ2g/bd+9+DeCTLeY/1d3cuncKEA txjk0+6BrPaFGb6tbjM56iLZO6Xriaqr8FBXIme5qh7xGFmRwSXw37z4PRl0GDcmZW7P blzS7a7TjlSNS7doyy3okLwVpdWzLEruOINlHXGgMsIBbyChk3fgYTi3RHGm88Pdxo0B lmmQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.129.68 with SMTP id nu4mr34389716igb.9.1373366838260; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 03:47:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 18:47:18 +0800 Subject: Re: A small question about PEP 8 From: Xue Fuqiao To: Joshua Landau Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:09:56 +0200 Cc: python-list X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 73 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1373382597 news.xs4all.nl 16010 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:54897 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:50257 On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Joshua Landau wrote: > On 8 July 2013 00:32, Xue Fuqiao wrote: >> I'm a Python newbie and just started reading PEP 8. PEP 8 says: >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> |The closing brace/bracket/parenthesis on multi-line constructs may >> |either line up under the last item of the list, as in: >> | >> |my_list =3D [ >> | 1, 2, 3, >> | 4, 5, 6, >> | ] >> |result =3D some_function_that_takes_arguments( >> | 'a', 'b', 'c', >> | 'd', 'e', 'f', >> | ) >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> I think the last item in my_list/result is 6/'f', respectively. So why >> doesn't the bracket/paren line up _under_ the last item? ISTM the code >> isn't consistent with the description. > You will grow to be a wonderful pedant. What it means is that the > indentation will match the last one. Imagine: > > """ > a_wonderful_set_of_things =3D { > bannanas_made_of_apples, > chocolate_covered_horns, > doors_that_slide, > china_but_on_the_moon, > buffalo_with_windy_hair, > not_missing_an_end_brace > """=C2=B9 > > Now, there are several places you can put the end brace. You can (be a > massive fool and) put it after the last item: > > """ > a_wonderful_set_of_things =3D { > ..., > not_missing_an_end_brace} > """ > > You can also (be a fool and) put it at the same *indentation*: > > """ > a_wonderful_set_of_things =3D { > ..., > not_missing_an_end_brace > } > """ > > Or you can (be sane) and put it at no indentation: > > """ > a_wonderful_set_of_things =3D { > ..., > not_missing_an_end_brace > } > """ > > Theoretically, there are more places you could put it (but we won't go > there... *shudder*). > > The second of these is the one that PEP 8 was trying to explain. I > agree wording could be improved, but hey. You can file a bug report at > bugs.python.org if you care enough. Done as issue 18412. -- Best regards, Xue Fuqiao.