Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.034 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 0.94; '*S*': 0.00; 'assuming': 0.09; 'except:': 0.09; 'try:': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; 'thread': 0.14; 'sequence:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; "aren't": 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'serve': 0.31; 'subject:what': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'acceptable': 0.36; 'subject:Simple': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'does': 0.39; 'july': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'to:addr:gmail.com': 0.65; 'do:': 0.91; '2013': 0.98 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=5IW24vOZLMXurkGORbf3Glvi7bax3bokk3yVjxRNp/Q=; b=crTqLr+jtsTWuNlBYywlr/42UwxVrTWpnTK+PiGS7elXZjD+gyI3/GPG0HktrOMuzI ob6a2WYMFJLhmvDZIcDIxeWorFH8D2bXWfvk+BTmhr46FBz9SWog/K3RRYx/EMmPwq/F d5BtQSVAyFZbcvNLSP8quFMl7y1uj0d/e8u2FwfAWKM1KCF7GVHm+JEIeE4pRmEgudPs M/n0c9MxvMx4f9pM+J+bFc5eOkeudG4aCi42R3A5aAhrMYW5NMDei2K9syzrxylNbu0P TdXlY8YN3Bu3spbPX1pLP9m+UDo9uZgAyqs9VYQtLNBAokJRtpygDNM0YRCG0tN2X+JH 6T4g== X-Received: by 10.112.42.44 with SMTP id k12mr7747398lbl.63.1373136262548; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:44:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Joshua Landau Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 19:43:42 +0100 Subject: Re: Simple recursive sum function | what's the cause of the weird behaviour? To: Russel Walker Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: python-list X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1373136270 news.xs4all.nl 15907 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41540 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:50073 On 6 July 2013 13:59, Russel Walker wrote: > Since I've already wasted a thread I might as well... > > Does this serve as an acceptable solution? > > def supersum(sequence, start=0): > result = type(start)() > for item in sequence: > try: > result += supersum(item, start) > except: > result += item > return result It's probably more robust to do: def supersum(sequence, start=0): for item in sequence: try: result = result + supersum(item, start) except: result = result + item return result as that way you aren't assuming the signature of type(start).