Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Return-Path: X-Original-To: python-list@python.org Delivered-To: python-list@mail.python.org X-Spam-Status: OK 0.000 X-Spam-Evidence: '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; '[1,': 0.09; 'except:': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'try:': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; 'thread': 0.14; "'a',": 0.16; "'b',": 0.16; '3],': 0.16; '[])': 0.16; 'instance:': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:dip0.t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'received:t-ipconnect.de': 0.16; 'sequence:': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; '>>>': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; "i've": 0.25; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'serve': 0.31; 'subject:what': 0.31; 'subject:the': 0.34; 'acceptable': 0.36; 'subject:Simple': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'depends': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: python-list@python.org From: Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> Subject: Re: Simple recursive sum function | what's the cause of the weird behaviour? Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 15:19:30 +0200 Organization: None References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5084b036.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: KNode/4.7.3 X-BeenThere: python-list@python.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion list for the Python programming language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Message-ID: Lines: 24 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:888:2000:d::a6 X-Trace: 1373116733 news.xs4all.nl 15883 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44585 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:50062 Russel Walker wrote: > Since I've already wasted a thread I might as well... > > Does this serve as an acceptable solution? > > def supersum(sequence, start=0): > result = type(start)() > for item in sequence: > try: > result += supersum(item, start) > except: > result += item > return result That depends on what is an acceptable result ;) For instance: >>> supersum([2, 3], 1) 5 >>> supersum([[1], ["abc"]], []) [1, 'a', 'b', 'c']